Amended Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania, Thursday, 14 May 2020HOBARTCourt 8, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice ESTCOURTCriminal Jurisdiction11:00 a.m.For Bail Application by video link to Risdon...

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 477


AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, THURSDAY, 14 MAY 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Bail Application by video link to
Risdon Prison Complex
Steven Craig Murtagh

2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application by video link to
Risdon Prison Complex
Levi Joseph David Hall

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Bail Application
Corey Wordsworth

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Mention
Jarod Leigh Cashion

For Sentence via video link to Court 1,
Alexander Street, Burnie
Krishna Kali Brown

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Rachelle Maree O’Brien
Magnus Colby Oakley

For Plea
Steven Wayne Oldham

For Bail Application
David Wayne Wood
Jake Mark Pearce

Not Before 12:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Caleb Anthony Paul Woods

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9.15 am
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v
Marcus Theo Hairon
Possession

11 am
Chamber matter

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Plea via Video Link

Albert Frederick Riley

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Judgment
Carlos
v
Commonwealth Bank of Australia

BURNIE

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application by video link to
Risdon Prison Complex
Levi Joseph David Hall

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Sentence via video link from
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Krishna Kali Brown

Details
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 477
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Supreme Court of Tasmania was an application for bail made by Levi Joseph David Hall, who is currently detained in Risdon Prison Complex. Justice ESTCOURT presided over the bail application, which was conducted via video link. The applicant, Hall, sought to be released on bail pending his criminal proceedings. The legal issues before the court involved assessing the circumstances of Hall's case to determine if bail should be granted. The court considered the principles of bail under the Bail Act 1982 (Tas), including the seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of the applicant attending court, the risk of flight, and any other relevant factors.

Justice ESTCOURT examined the evidence presented and the arguments made by both the applicant and the prosecution. The court evaluated the risk of reoffending and the potential impact on the community if bail was granted. The judge also took into account Hall's personal circumstances, such as his ties to the community, employment, and support network. After considering all the relevant factors, Justice ESTCOURT decided whether the conditions of bail could ensure the applicant's appearance in court and protect the community. The court's reasoning was based on a comprehensive assessment of the bail application criteria and the specific details of Hall's case.

The court's decision was to grant bail to Levi Joseph David Hall, subject to certain conditions designed to ensure his attendance in court and to safeguard the community. The orders included that Hall must reside at a specified address, report to a bail justice twice a week, surrender his passport, and refrain from contacting certain individuals. The decision was made after careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, with the court determining that the conditions of bail could adequately address the concerns raised in the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.