Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 1 February 2018 Summary

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, THURSDAY, 1 FEBRUARY 2018

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Norman Edward Ohl
v
State of Tasmania

Michael Arnold Carew
v
State of Tasmania

Director of Public Prosecutions
v
MAC

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
Erich Leonard Ungerhofer
Jackson Elijah Yammi Mansfield

For Bail Application
Ziggy Kenneth Hancock-Yost
(Part-Heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, two criminal cases were scheduled for hearing on 1 February 2018. Norman Edward Ohl and Michael Arnold Carew were both listed for directions hearings against the State of Tasmania, while Erich Leonard Ungerhofer and Jackson Elijah Yammi Mansfield were to appear for a plea in mitigation. Ziggy Kenneth Hancock-Yost was scheduled for a bail application. The court also listed a case involving the Director of Public Prosecutions against MAC.

The legal issues involved in these cases likely pertained to procedural matters such as directions for ongoing criminal proceedings, plea mitigation strategies, and bail applications. The court was required to determine the appropriate next steps in each case, consider the arguments for and against bail, and evaluate the plea agreements in mitigation of sentence.

The reasoning and outcome of these hearings are not detailed in the extract, but the court would have considered the specific circumstances of each case, including the evidence, legal arguments, and any applicable laws or precedents. The final orders would have been determined based on these factors, potentially including directions for further proceedings, decisions on bail, or acceptance of plea agreements.

No further orders are specified in the extract, but the court would have made appropriate rulings based on the merits of each case. The outcomes would have been communicated to the parties involved and recorded in the court's official records.

Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 1 February 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established