AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 1 DECEMBER 2016
AMENDED LIST FOR LAUNCESTON
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
A Witness
For Bail Variation
Stephen John Edwards
Corey Matthew Kedey
For Trial
Wayne Gregory Pattison
(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Michael Thomas Jones
Nicholas Andrew Burn
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
For Trial
Corey Graeme Farr
(Part-Heard)
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Zachariah Angus Denwer-Ripper
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Jane Elizabeth Holden
v
The State of Tasmania
(Part-Heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Further Submissions via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Clarence City Council
v
Darryl Robert Howlin and Ors
Andrew John McCormack and Ors
v
Lihua Qin and Ors
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
PDW
4:00pm For Further Submissions via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Clarence City Council v Darryl Robert Howlin and Ors
Andrew John McCormack and Ors v Lihua Qin and Ors
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention by Video Link
Shaun Anthony Hugo
Christopher Luke Finn
Daniel Lee Upton
For Mention
Emma May Foster
Vanessa Rae Hardwick
For Bail Application
Mystie Lorraine Brooke
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Brady Christopher Oates
Joshua Joseph Goold
Dane Ronald Pyke
Dwayne Grant Seabourne
For Application
Raymond John Pennington
For Plea
DLJ
Steven John Henderson
For Bail Consent
Barry William Evans
Andrew Stephen Glover
Jodie Lynn Parkinson
Dale Graham Parkinson
Hayden Luke Ryan
Marshall Pearson Blythe Woolnough
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 1 December 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 263
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 263
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases likely encompass a range of criminal offences such as public disorder, assault, and drug-related charges, as well as civil disputes involving personal injury, contractual obligations, and local government matters. The Supreme Court of Tasmania, as the highest state court, is responsible for resolving these complex legal issues, which may involve the interpretation of state legislation, common law principles, and procedural rules governing court operations. The court's decisions in these cases will have significant implications for the parties involved, potentially affecting their legal rights, obligations, and entitlements.
The reasoning and outcome of each case will depend on the specific facts and evidence presented, as well as the applicable legal standards and precedents. The court will consider the submissions from both parties, examine the evidence, and apply the relevant law to reach a decision. In criminal cases, the court must determine whether the prosecution has proven the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. In civil cases, the court will assess the merits of the claims and defenses, and may award damages, injunctions, or other remedies as appropriate. The final orders will be communicated to the parties and documented in the court's records.
The Supreme Court of Tasmania's decisions in these cases will contribute to the development of legal principles and provide guidance for future litigation. The outcomes will also impact the affected individuals and entities, potentially resolving disputes and providing a basis for further legal action if necessary. The detailed scheduling and procedural arrangements reflect the court's commitment to ensuring that justice is administered efficiently and effectively.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.