Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 30 October 2017 Summary

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 30 OCTOBER 2017

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention

DJT
SAML
Steven Craig Murtagh

For Trial
George Joseph Bilinski
(Part Heard)

1:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Rory Michael Murphy

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Zahid Akram Khan Sher
v
Daryl John Smart and anor

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Brendan Lee Jones

For Bail Consent
Patrick Charles Hay

For Trial
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst
Christopher Adam Leaman
Adam Arnold Jones

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser
v
State of Tasmania

In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Anthony John (Jon) Wheaton
v
Annette Wilson and Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Brodie Edmond Fazackerley
RWG

To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
Jamie Lee Vimpany

4:00pm For Bail Application
Damien William Harris

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie Before Justice Pearce

10:00 a.m.
For Mention by Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Darren Ward Gale

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Malahkhye Dean Belcher

To Follow
For Mention
Dwayne Grant Seabourne

To Follow
For Plea
Keith Wayne Woods

4:15 p.m.
For Mention
GEB

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, dated 30 October 2017, outline various criminal and civil proceedings scheduled across different locations and courts. Notable cases include a bail application by Rory Michael Murphy, a trial involving George Joseph Bilinski, and a directions hearing in a case involving Zahid Akram Khan and Daryl John Smart. The court sessions are presided over by Justice WOOD, Justice ESTCOURT, Justice BRETT, Chief Justice BLOW, Acting Justice SLICER, and Justice Pearce. The cases involve a range of legal issues, from bail applications and preliminary proceedings to full trials and directions hearings.

The legal issues before the court encompass bail applications, preliminary hearings, and the conduct of trials. For instance, the bail application by Rory Michael Murphy required the court to consider the factors relevant to granting or denying bail. The trial of George Joseph Bilinski, which was part heard, involved assessing evidence and arguments pertinent to the charges against him. The directions hearing in the case of Zahid Akram Khan and Daryl John Smart necessitated the court to provide guidance on the procedural aspects of the case. Each case demanded a careful evaluation of the evidence and the application of relevant legal principles to ensure justice was served.

The court's reasoning and outcome in these cases were not detailed in the law lists, but the scheduling of these hearings indicates a structured approach to managing the court's caseload. The court's role was to ensure that each case received appropriate attention, with hearings scheduled to allow for thorough examination of the evidence and arguments. The outcomes of these hearings would depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented. The law lists reflect the court's commitment to managing its docket efficiently while ensuring that each case is given due consideration.

The final orders in these cases would be determined by the outcomes of the hearings. The court would issue rulings based on the evidence presented and the application of the law. Bail applications would result in either a grant or denial of bail, trials would conclude with a verdict and sentencing if necessary, and directions hearings would lead to further procedural instructions for the parties involved. The detailed scheduling in the law lists underscores the importance of timely and organised court proceedings in the administration of justice.

Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 30 October 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established