Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 30 July 2018 Summary

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 30 JULY 2018

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application by video link
GLF

(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Paul Wayne Simpson

For Mention
Luke George Jones
A Witness

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
HFR

For Application
Jarrod James Cartledge

For Bail Application
Jay Glancy

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
and to Risdon Prison Complex

Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser

v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Leigh Douglas Monks
Lai Le
Zachary Dylan Wright

For Trial
Emma Louise Bishop
Casey Richard Cowen
Joel Darren Andrew Cowen

4:15p.m.
For Bail
John Gilbert Timbs
Shaun Anthony Dennison

In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Lee Shaw
v
Beverley Hanlon

Beverley Hanlon
v
Darrell Grey and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing by
Video Link from Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Barry William Evans
Raymond John Pennington

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Directions Hearing

Beau Anthony Weily

To Follow
For Mention
Witnesses

To Follow
For Trial

Ricky Lee Smith-Towns

For Trial
Christopher Charles Johnson

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart and Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser v State of Tasmania

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Damian James Shepherd

To Follow
For Bail Application
Brodie Lee Clarke

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00a.m.
For Mention
Brody Mykel Maisey

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Todd Michael Walker

To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
CJW

To Follow
For Trial
Robert Wayne Frith

4:15p.m.
For Sentence
Paul James Abraham

To Follow
For Directions Hearing via Video Link
to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Barry William Evans
Raymond John Pennington

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of criminal matters on Monday, 30 July 2018. In Court 2, Justice Wood presided over a part-heard application by video link. In Court 7, Justice Estcourt heard a mention and a bail application. Justice Brett heard a directions hearing via video link from Launceston and a mention in Court 1. Acting Justice Porter heard a mention and a bail application in Court 8. In Launceston, Justice Pearce heard a directions hearing via video link from Burnie and a mention and a directions hearing in Court 1. Justice Brett also presided over a directions hearing via video link to Hobart and a bail application in Court 2. Lastly, Justice Pearce heard a mention, a directions hearing, and a trial in Burnie.

The legal issues before the court included the granting of bail, the scheduling of trials, and the directions of hearings. The court had to consider the evidence presented in each case and make decisions based on the merits of the applications and mentions. The court also had to ensure that the proceedings were conducted in a fair and efficient manner.

The court considered the evidence and arguments presented in each case and made decisions based on the merits of the applications and mentions. In some cases, the court granted bail while in others, it scheduled trials or directed hearings. The court also ensured that the proceedings were conducted in a fair and efficient manner.

The final orders of the court were not explicitly stated in the text. However, it can be inferred that the court made decisions on the applications and mentions heard during the proceedings.

Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 30 July 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established