Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 3 August 2020 Summary

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 3 AUGUST 2020

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 pm
Directions Hearing
Luke David Buck

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jason Shane Fahey

For Trial
Christopher Vernon Clark

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Steven Craig Murtagh

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
to Wilfred Lopes Centre and
to PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston
James Bietman

For Directions Hearing via video-link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Jackson Elijah Mansfield
Joshua Michael Murtagh
Luke Matthew John Chatters
Adrian Roy Harris
Robert Maxwell Brown
Ty Ferguson

For Directions Hearing via video-link
to Hobart Reception Prison
SC

For Directions Hearing via video-link
to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Amber Jessica Royer

For Directions Hearing
Tony Matthew White
Sharni Marie Downey
Rodney Jeffrey Bailey
Kenneth John Bailey
Wayne Gregory Pattison
MJP
Christopher John Brown

For Witness on Final Notice

For Bail Consent
Georgia Skrepetos
Kai Kimmo Juvakka
Daniel Nicky Smith
Kevin John Clancy
Chelsea Patricia Doreen Smith
Christopher John Howard
Thomas Hislop
AJC
Michael Eddie French
Mohammad Maleki
Biniyam Tewoldebirhan Hagos
Mohammad Heidari
Yohannes Tesdasilassie Tsegazeab
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi
Hossein Karimi
Harley George McKenzie

Not before 11:15a.m.
For Bail Application
Frank John Simpson

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Rick Keith Gesler
Brody John Treloar
KJE

For Plea
Krystal Lee Reynolds

4:15pm
For Bail Application
Toby David Torrents

PWR, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link
from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
and to Wilfred Lopes Centre
James Bietman

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Ryan John Williams
Tamara Sue Reeve
WD
Craig Ashley Delaney
Kurt Robert Dezoete
Oscar Jyles Dyett
Christine Joy Radford
Jaqueline Maree Broomhall
Brodi Dillon Howard
Nicholas Kyle Jones

For Plea
Zoe Leanne Whiley

For Special Hearing
NDT

12:00p.m.
For Bail Application via Video Link
Terry Johnann Jones
Monday, 3 August 2020
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
Nancy Carolann Jane White & Ors
v

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a range of criminal and civil matters were scheduled for hearing on Monday, 3 August 2020, across various locations including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. The criminal cases involved individuals facing a variety of charges, with some hearings being conducted via video-link from different prisons and correctional centres. Notable among the cases was the directions hearing for Luke David Buck in Hobart, presided over by Chief Justice Blow, and the plea hearing for Krystal Lee Reynolds in Launceston, overseen by Justice Brett.

The legal issues before the court included determining the appropriate course of action for ongoing criminal cases, such as setting bail, scheduling trials, and addressing procedural directions. The court had to consider the implications of conducting hearings via video-link, particularly in ensuring fairness and the effective administration of justice. Additionally, in the civil matter heard in Burnie, the court was tasked with resolving disputes between Nancy Carolann Jane White and others, presided over by Justice Pearce.

The reasoning and outcomes of each case would depend on the specific legal arguments presented, the evidence provided, and the applicable laws. Given the nature of the hearings listed, outcomes would range from setting bail conditions and trial dates to issuing directions that shape the progression of the cases. The court's decisions were expected to reflect a balance between the rights of the accused, the safety of the public, and the efficient administration of justice.

The final orders from these hearings would be documented in the court's records, providing clarity on the next steps for each case, including any further hearings or trials that might be necessary.

Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 3 August 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established