AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 27 AUGUST 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan
Amanda Louise White
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Jessica Chloe Richards
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Timothy Lee King
Braedon Isaac Males
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Emma Louise Bishop
Casey Richard Cowen
Joel Darren Andrew Cowen
(Part-Heard)
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Fingal Pastoral Pty Ltd
v
Page Seager Lawyers
LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Supreme Court, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link
from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Fingal Pastoral Pty Ltd
v
Page Seager Lawyers
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jessica Chloe Richards
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 27 August 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 493
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 493
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed bail applications, sentencing, trial proceedings, and directions hearings in both criminal and civil cases. In criminal matters, the court needed to determine whether bail should be granted to defendants, impose appropriate sentences, and proceed with trials. In civil cases, the court was required to provide directions for the progression of litigation involving property disputes and professional negligence claims.
The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the law lists. However, the cases reflect the court's responsibility to administer justice in both criminal and civil matters, ensuring that legal processes are followed and that defendants and plaintiffs receive fair treatment. Each case would have been dealt with according to the specific legal and factual circumstances presented.
No final orders were stated in the law lists. The outcomes of the cases would depend on the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by the parties involved. The Supreme Court of Tasmania's role in these proceedings was to ensure that justice was administered fairly and efficiently.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.