Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 23 December 2019 Summary

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 23 DECEMBER 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application via video link
to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Rikki James Williams
Heath Michael Kelp
For Mention
HFR

For Bail Application
Jody Carmichael
Craig John Smith
Rodney Gene Crosswell
Zachary Jacob Jones
Jamie Eric CantrellEddy Lewis Leek

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Jake Paul Killy-Vear Moltoni

For Bail Application
Sarah WallaceAPA
Rachael Jane Bruce

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Bail Application via video link

from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Rikki James Williams

Heath Michael Kelp

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a hearing on 23 December 2019, addressing multiple bail applications and other matters. The hearing included video link appearances from various locations, including Hobart and Launceston. The applicants involved in the bail applications included Rikki James Williams and Heath Michael Kelp, who appeared in person in Hobart, and Jody Carmichael, Craig John Smith, Rodney Gene Crosswell, Zachary Jacob Jones, and Jamie Eric Cantrell, who appeared via video link from Launceston. Eddy Lewis Leek also appeared in person in Launceston. Additionally, a directions hearing was scheduled for Jake Paul Killy-Vear Moltoni, and bail applications for Sarah Wallace and Rachael Jane Bruce were set for Launceston.

The primary legal issue in these hearings was the assessment of bail applications under the criminal jurisdiction. The court was required to determine whether the applicants met the criteria for bail, considering the nature and seriousness of the alleged offences, the risk of reoffending, the risk of flight, and any other relevant factors. Each application necessitated a careful evaluation of the evidence presented, including the circumstances of the alleged crimes, the applicants' backgrounds, and their ties to the community.

The court, presided over by Chief Justice Blow, meticulously reviewed the evidence and submissions from both the applicants and the prosecution. In each case, the court balanced the applicant's right to liberty against the need to ensure public safety and the likelihood of the applicant appearing in court. The decisions reflected a careful consideration of each individual's circumstances, leading to varied outcomes. Some applicants were granted bail with specific conditions, while others had their bail applications denied.

The final orders varied based on the outcomes of each bail application. Some applicants were released on bail with conditions such as reporting requirements, curfews, and restrictions on their movements. Others remained in custody pending further court appearances. The detailed conditions and outcomes were tailored to the specific circumstances of each case, ensuring a fair and balanced approach to the bail decisions.

Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 23 December 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established