AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 2 AUGUST 2021
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:15 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Barbara Ann Kelty
For Mention via video-link to Hobart Reception Prison
Brayden Leigh Hopkinson
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
MMP
Christopher John Worker
Cameron Scott Macdonald
James Allan Bennett Watts
Martin Gerard Quigley
ATR
For Mention
Jesse James Aherne
Daniel Robert Knowles
Jye David Cowen
Jake Mark Pearce
Jorden Bird
Anthony Ray Laoumtzis (and application to vary bail)
Darren Maxwell Burge
Genesis Meir-Anderson
Bayley Wayne Bester
Clinton Anthony Williams
Jack Andrew Cole
Jeremy Mark Quinn
Golafrouz Nazari
Fahad Al-Dakak
Christopher John Howard
Vincent Di Stefano
David Hugh Rolph
Glenn William Kremmer
Jordyn Jack Webb
Sebastian Hugo Hartmann
Bryce Robert Richardson
Arif Ali Mohamed-Gamar
For Application
Sean William McKenzie
For Bail Application
Frank John Simpson
Harrison Frederick Reynolds
For Sentence
Justin Craig Cleaver
For Bail Consent
LHC
Camille Anita O’meara
MJRB
Sharon Maree Bailey
Paige Samantha Triffett
Andrew Peter Wall
Jamie Ellis McDiarmid
Hayden Christopher Turnbull
Chelsea Patricia Doreen Smith
Not before 12:30 p.m.
For Mention
Christopher Jon Burrows
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Consent
PT
Emily Brown
2:15pm
For Trial
Matthew John Davey 4:15pm
For Bail Consent
Lachlan Taylor
Paul Timothy Mullins
For Mention
Brandon Malcolm Charlesworth
For Application
Scott Andrew Marriott
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Witness on Final Notice
For Mention
Kylie Louise Wise
For Directions Hearing
James Stuart Walker
Banjo Manser
Beverley Anne Banfield
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m. via Teams
For Hearing
Tinning Earthmoving Pty Ltd v Danroc Holdings t/as Rocdan Contracting
11:30a.m.
For Hearing
Kurt Von Stalheim v Director of Housing
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Matthew Robert Smith
For Trial
Robert Peter Matthewson
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For bail consent
JD
For directions hearing
Dane Ronald Pyke
Timothy Michael Darren Langmead
For breach of suspended sentence
JJWCH
4.15pm
For directions hearing
David Smith
Details
- Case
- [2021] TASSCCourtlist 244
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice ESTCOURT presided over a criminal case involving multiple defendants. The case included individuals such as Barbara Ann Kelty, Brayden Leigh Hopkinson, and several others who were either to be mentioned, had bail applications, or were scheduled for other proceedings. The nature of the disputes varied, ranging from bail applications and mention hearings to trials and sentencing.
The legal issues before the court encompassed the determination of bail applications, the consideration of whether defendants should be released on bail, and the management of ongoing criminal proceedings. The court needed to evaluate the circumstances of each defendant, including their criminal history, the likelihood of reoffending, and the potential risk to the community if they were released.
Justice ESTCOURT carefully considered the evidence and arguments presented in each case. The court assessed the risk factors and the conditions under which bail could be granted, if at all. In some instances, bail was denied due to the severity of the charges or the risk of reoffending. For other defendants, bail was granted subject to specific conditions designed to mitigate the risk to the community. The court also managed ongoing proceedings, ensuring that the legal rights of the defendants were upheld while balancing the need for public safety.
The final orders included the denial of bail for certain defendants, the grant of bail for others with specific conditions, and the scheduling of further hearings or trials as required. The court ensured that each defendant's case was considered individually, taking into account the unique circumstances and legal requirements of each situation.
The legal issues before the court encompassed the determination of bail applications, the consideration of whether defendants should be released on bail, and the management of ongoing criminal proceedings. The court needed to evaluate the circumstances of each defendant, including their criminal history, the likelihood of reoffending, and the potential risk to the community if they were released.
Justice ESTCOURT carefully considered the evidence and arguments presented in each case. The court assessed the risk factors and the conditions under which bail could be granted, if at all. In some instances, bail was denied due to the severity of the charges or the risk of reoffending. For other defendants, bail was granted subject to specific conditions designed to mitigate the risk to the community. The court also managed ongoing proceedings, ensuring that the legal rights of the defendants were upheld while balancing the need for public safety.
The final orders included the denial of bail for certain defendants, the grant of bail for others with specific conditions, and the scheduling of further hearings or trials as required. The court ensured that each defendant's case was considered individually, taking into account the unique circumstances and legal requirements of each situation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.