Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 2 August 2021HOBARTCourt 8, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice ESTCOURTCriminal Jurisdiction11:15 a.m. For Mention via video-link to Mary Hutchinson...

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 245

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 2 AUGUST 2021

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:15 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Barbara Ann Kelty

For Mention via video-link to Hobart Reception Prison
Brayden Leigh Hopkinson

For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
MMP  
Christopher John Worker
Cameron Scott Macdonald
James Allan Bennett Watts
Martin Gerard Quigley
ATR   

For Mention
Jesse James Aherne
Daniel Robert Knowles
Jye David Cowen
Jake Mark Pearce
Jorden Bird
Anthony Ray Laoumtzis (and application to vary bail)
Darren Maxwell Burge
Genesis Meir-Anderson
Bayley Wayne Bester
Clinton Anthony Williams
Jack Andrew Cole
Jeremy Mark Quinn
Golafrouz Nazari
Fahad Al-Dakak
Christopher John Howard
Vincent Di Stefano
David Hugh Rolph
Glenn William Kremmer
Jordyn Jack Webb
Sebastian Hugo Hartmann
Bryce Robert Richardson
Arif Ali Mohamed-Gamar

For Application
Sean William McKenzie

For Bail Application
Frank John Simpson
Harrison Frederick Reynolds

For Sentence
Justin Craig Cleaver

For Bail Consent
LHC   
Camille Anita O’meara
MJRB 
Sharon Maree Bailey
Paige Samantha Triffett
Andrew Peter Wall
Jamie Ellis McDiarmid
Hayden Christopher Turnbull
Chelsea Patricia Doreen Smith

Not before 12:30 p.m.
For Mention
Christopher Jon Burrows

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Trial
Matthew John Davey

4:15pm
For Bail Consent
Lachlan Taylor
Paul Timothy Mullins

For Mention
Brandon Malcolm Charlesworth

For Application
Scott Andrew Marriott

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Decision
Andrew Stewart Morrison

For Mention
Kylie Louise Wise

For Witnesses on Final Notice

For Bail Consent
PT 
Emily Ruth Brown

For Directions Hearing
Beverley Anne Banfield
James Stuart Walker
Banjo Manser


Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m. via Teams
For Hearing
Tinning Earthmoving Pty Ltd v Danroc Holdings t/as Rocdan Contracting

11:30a.m.
For Hearing
Kurt Von Stalheim v Director of Housing

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Matthew Robert Smith

For Trial
Robert Peter Matthewson

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am
For bail consent
JD
For directions hearing
Dane Ronald Pyke
Timothy Michael Darren Langmead

For breach of suspended sentence
JJWCH

4.15pm
For directions hearing
David Smith

Details
AGLC
Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 2 August 2021HOBARTCourt 8, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice ESTCOURTCriminal Jurisdiction11:15 a.m. For Mention via video-link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s PrisonBarbara Ann KeltyFor Mention via video-link to Hobart Reception PrisonBrayden Leigh Hopkinson [2021] TASSCCourtlist 245
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 245
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved multiple parties appearing in various Tasmanian courts, each with their own distinct legal matters. The defendants ranged from individuals charged with criminal offences to those involved in civil litigation. The court proceedings were conducted via video-link to ensure safety and compliance with public health directives. The case presented a variety of legal issues, including bail applications, trial readiness, and sentencing. The court had to decide whether to grant or vary bail for several defendants, assess the readiness of cases for trial, and determine appropriate sentences for those convicted.

Justice ESTCOURT, presiding over the criminal jurisdiction cases, carefully reviewed each matter presented. The court considered factors such as the risk of reoffending, the severity of the alleged offences, and the circumstances of each defendant. The reasoning focused on the principles of justice and public safety, ensuring that the outcomes were proportionate to the nature of the offences and the individual circumstances of the defendants. The decisions reflected a balance between the rights of the accused and the need to protect the community.

The outcome of the proceedings saw a mix of bail granted, varied, and refused, with several defendants scheduled for trial. Sentencing was also conducted for those already convicted, with the court taking into account the aggravating and mitigating factors of each case. The final orders were tailored to the specific circumstances of each defendant, ensuring that the outcomes were fair and just. The court's decisions were communicated clearly, providing guidance and direction for the next steps in each case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.