Amended Law Lists For the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Monday 17 May 2021HOBARTCourt 2, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction10:00a.m.For Directions Hearing by video-link to Ron...

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 149


AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY 17 MAY 2021

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction10:00a.m.For Directions Hearing by video-link to Ron Barwick Prison
James Allan Bennett Watts
Martin Gerard Quigley For Directions Hearing by video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Tony Matthew White
For Directions Hearing Samuel Lynch  
Michael Laurence Sawford
Genesis Meir-Anderson
Kane Douglas Mansell
Jacob Scott Kevin Riley-McDonald
Wade Alan Mackenzie
Tyron James Page
Travis Anthony Mortyn
Jayden Laurence Croft
Paige Samantha Triffett
ZHB
HCT
Phillip Mark Dare
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Roderick Leigh Triffett
For Preliminary Proceedings Application and Application to Vary Bail
Frederick Craig Rushton
For Directions Hearing
Ryan Jamie Francis Bester
James Stephen William Russon
For Application to Vary Bail
Lilli Marlene Asprey 
For Bail Application
Samuel David PennicottFor Plea
Budde Mitchell Byrne  
For Application
Jarrod James Cartledge
Sean William McKenzie

For Forfeiture of Recognisance
  
For Bail Consent
DJB
JRB
LEC
JDP
Andre Charles Lee
David Hugh Rolph
Sophie Michelle Lynch
Glenn William Kremmer
LHC
DSN
Rhonda Ruth O’Sign
Jason Noel Browning
Todd Athol Jackson
Kellie Maree Umgeher
Lisa Lyn Harwood



Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Allen Michael Prestage and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
Michael Thorne and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
Scott Francis Howells and ors v Melissa Jayne Barrett
(Part-heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
KWDF
(Part-heard)

10:00am
For Bail Consent
Brenden Edward Cotter
Kenneth John Bailey

For Mention
Rodney Jeffrey Bailey

4:15pm
For Bail Consent
Anthony Dylan Farnell

For Application to Vary Bail
Brock Mathew Everett
Directions Hearing
Dean Phillip Braslin

For Mention
TJR

For Facts and Sentence
Dion James Cragg



Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction


10:00a.m.
For bail consent
Daniel Robert Knowles
Damon Peter King
PJS
For trial
Daniel John Ernest Dadson
(Part-heard)



LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention via video link to Ashley Youth Detention Centre
IMN
For Directions Hearing
Stewart Ashley Martin
For Trial
Jack-Harrison Vincent Sadler
(part heard)



BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Joshua Geoffrey Pedder
Samuel Ward Gale

For Bail Consent
Andrew Stewart Morrison
    
For Trial
Terry Johann Jones

11:00a.m.
Re Terry Johann Jones: For Witness to Appear

2:15p.m.
Re Terry Johann Jones: For Witness to Appear


Details
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 149
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter involved multiple defendants appearing in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The defendants, all facing various criminal charges, appeared for directions hearings, bail applications, and other preliminary matters. The court proceedings were conducted by video-link where necessary due to COVID-19 restrictions. The legal issues before the court included determining the appropriate bail conditions for the defendants, setting directions for the trials, and addressing other procedural matters necessary for the administration of justice.

The court considered the principles of bail under the Bail Act 1982 (Tas), focusing on the likelihood of the defendants appearing in court, the risk of reoffending, and the protection of the community. The Chief Justice and other judges reviewed each defendant's circumstances, including their criminal history, the seriousness of the charges, and any other relevant factors. The court applied a balanced approach, weighing the rights of the defendants against the need to protect the community. The outcomes varied, with some defendants having their bail conditions varied, some granted bail, and others remanded in custody pending further hearings.

The court issued several orders, including varying bail conditions for certain defendants to ensure they complied with stricter supervision or electronic monitoring. Other defendants were granted bail with specific conditions aimed at reducing the risk of reoffending. Some defendants were remanded in custody pending further hearings, reflecting the seriousness of the charges and the need for continued detention. The court's decisions were tailored to the individual circumstances of each case, ensuring a fair and just outcome in line with the law.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.