AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 7 DECEMBER 2018
HOBART
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Scott Darrell Rhodes
Alexander Brett White
Alexander James Shepherd
Christopher Patrick Direen
For Facts and Sentence
David Loidl O’May
11.30 a.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Nicholas Alan James Lawton
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Shannon Douglas Gee
For Trial
Shaun Anthony Dennison
John Gilbert Timbs
Monique Rose Lynch
(Part-Heard)
2:15 p.m.
For Facts and Sentence
Shannon Douglas Gee
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
1:45 p.m.
For Application for Compensation Order
Luke George Jones
2:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Michael William Triffitt
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via Video Link
Peter John O’Neill
For Directions Hearing via Video Link to
Risdon Prison Complex
Michael Samuel Charlesworth
Craig Raymond Silva
For Directions Hearing via Video Link to
Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
Mitchell John Campbell
Chris Byers Rossi
For Directions Hearing
VKP
Mishal Almishalawy
Glenn William Seabourne
Rodney Dale Gregson
For Bail Consent
Aaron Charles McShane
Bilal Moutwari
For Plea
Wayne William Howlett
Not Before 11:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Matthew John Davey
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen John Edwards
v
Avant Insurance Ltd
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
John Raymond Downham
v
John Doer Marshall
(Part Heard)
1:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Maree Matic
v
Simpson Networks Pty Ltd and ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30am For Judgment via video link to
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Parsons v Director of Housing
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Bail Variation
Toby John Della Valle
To Follow
For Mention via video link to
Ron Barwick Minimum Security
Garry Lee Fullerton
To Follow
For Mention
Tayla Stevenson
To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Gemma Elizabeth Clark
Wayne Gregory Patterson
Christopher Brendan Keil
Dana Smith
Kerry Lee Cooper
Jerome Heath Peter Lees
Luke Anthony Joseph Burston
SAT
To Follow
For Bail Application via video link to
Risdon Prison Complex
SJR
To Follow
For Sentencing Submissions
Katrina Gail Smith (aka Chick)
To Follow
For Bail Consent
Nicholas David Preston
Marshall Todd Watson
Cathy-Lee Hahn
JBA
Steven Thomas Ashton
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Trevor Andrew Kempton
For Sentence
Tahlea Eve Miller
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 7 December 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 581
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 581
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed a wide array of criminal and civil matters. In the criminal cases, the court had to address matters such as bail applications, sentencing, and the continuation of trials. Questions of law and procedure would be considered, particularly in the context of directions hearings and the handling of defendants via video link from correctional facilities. In the civil cases, issues of contract law, insurance claims, and property disputes were central, with the court required to interpret relevant statutes and case law to deliver judgments.
The reasoning of the court was guided by established legal principles and the specifics of each case. For instance, in criminal cases, the court applied the principles of natural justice and fairness, ensuring that the rights of the accused were protected while also considering public safety. Sentencing decisions were informed by statutory guidelines and the precedents set by higher courts. In civil matters, the court focused on the interpretation and application of contractual terms, statutory obligations, and the equitable resolution of disputes. The judges considered the evidence presented, legal arguments from both parties, and relevant case law to reach their decisions.
The final orders issued by the court would reflect the outcomes of the hearings, including any sentences imposed, bail conditions set, or judgments delivered. For example, defendants might be sentenced, granted bail, or denied bail based on the court's assessment of the evidence and legal arguments. In civil cases, the court would issue judgments in favour of one party or the other, potentially awarding damages or setting aside contractual obligations. The detailed outcomes would be documented in the court's records and made available to the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.