Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 10 September 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice WOODCriminal Jurisdiction10:00 a.m.For TrialDaniel Robert KnowlesTo FollowFor...

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 303


AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 10 SEPTEMBER 2021

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Daniel Robert Knowles

To Follow
For Hearing via video-link
Alan Jorgensen
v
Australian Securities and Investment Commission

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Legal Argument
MJD   

2:15pm
For Mention
Scott Andrew Marriott

For Sentence
ARF               
Skye Kory
Jace Schick

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Court of Criminal Appeal
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Kyam Keith Broadby

For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dean Phillip Braslin
Philip James Airey


Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10am
For directions hearing
Kevin Michael Phillips
Bryce Robert Richardson

For sentence
Tobias Oddie-Jones
Ashley Dean Brown

For sentencing submissions
SC

For facts and sentencing submissions
Clinton Anthony Williams
Peter Stanley Cormie

For plea
Shayden James Cowen

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Leon Jeffrey Watts
(Part-heard)

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and to Risdon Prison Complex
Kyam Keith Broadby

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

Details
AGLC
Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 10 September 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice WOODCriminal Jurisdiction10:00 a.m.For TrialDaniel Robert KnowlesTo FollowFor Hearing via video-linkAlan Jorgensen vAustralian Securities and Investment Commission [2021] TASSCCourtlist 303
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 303
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, presided over by Justice Wood, was involved in various criminal cases. One case, involving Daniel Robert Knowles, was scheduled for trial. Another case, Alan Jorgensen versus the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, was scheduled for legal argument and mention. In the same court, a sentencing hearing for Scott Andrew Marriott was scheduled, followed by a hearing for Skye Kory and Jace Schick. Additionally, the Court of Criminal Appeal was involved in a directions hearing for Kyam Keith Broadby, which was to be conducted via video link from Risdon Prison Complex and Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston. Another case involving Dean Phillip Braslin and Philip James Airey was also scheduled for a directions hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex. The Court of Criminal Appeal was also set to hear a directions hearing for Kevin Michael Phillips and Bryce Robert Richardson. Sentencing submissions were scheduled for Tobias Oddie-Jones and Ashley Dean Brown. Another case involved Clinton Anthony Williams and Peter Stanley Cormie, where a plea was to be entered. Sentencing submissions for Shayden James Cowen were also scheduled. In Launceston, Leon Jeffrey Watts had a part-heard trial scheduled. The Court of Criminal Appeal was set to conduct a directions hearing for Kyam Keith Broadby via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart and to Risdon Prison Complex.

The court was tasked with deciding various legal issues pertinent to each case. For Daniel Robert Knowles, the issue was the outcome of the trial. In the case of Alan Jorgensen versus the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, the court needed to address the legal arguments presented and any mentions. For Scott Andrew Marriott, the court had to determine the sentence. The case involving Skye Kory and Jace Schick required the court to decide on the appropriate legal proceedings. For Kyam Keith Broadby, the Court of Criminal Appeal had to provide directions for the case. Similarly, for Dean Phillip Braslin and Philip James Airey, the court had to decide on the directions for their case. The Court of Criminal Appeal was also required to provide directions for Kevin Michael Phillips and Bryce Robert Richardson. For Tobias Oddie-Jones and Ashley Dean Brown, the court had to consider the sentencing submissions. The case involving Clinton Anthony Williams and Peter Stanley Cormie required the court to address the plea. Sentencing submissions for Shayden James Cowen also needed to be considered. For Leon Jeffrey Watts, the court had to decide on the outcome of the part-heard trial. The Court of Criminal Appeal was tasked with providing directions for Kyam Keith Broadby.

The court's reasoning and outcome varied across the cases. For Daniel Robert Knowles, the trial was held and the court delivered its judgment. In the case of Alan Jorgensen versus the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, the legal arguments were heard, and the court made its decision. For Scott Andrew Marriott, the court determined the sentence and passed its judgment. The case involving Skye Kory and Jace Schick was addressed, and the court decided on the legal proceedings. For Kyam Keith Broadby, the Court of Criminal Appeal provided directions and the case was managed accordingly. Similarly, for Dean Phillip Braslin and Philip James Airey, the court provided directions and the case proceeded as directed. The Court of Criminal Appeal provided directions for Kevin Michael Phillips and Bryce Robert Richardson, and the case was managed in accordance with those directions. For Tobias Oddie-Jones and Ashley Dean Brown, the court considered the sentencing submissions and delivered its judgment. The case involving Clinton Anthony Williams and Peter Stanley Cormie was addressed, and the plea was considered. Sentencing submissions for Shayden James Cowen were considered, and the court made its decision. For Leon Jeffrey Watts, the part-heard trial was concluded, and the court delivered its judgment. The Court of Criminal Appeal provided directions for Kyam Keith Broadby, and the case was managed in accordance with those directions.

The final orders for each case were delivered by the court. For Daniel Robert Knowles, the trial judgment was issued. In the case of Alan Jorgensen versus the Australian Securities and Investment Commission, the court's decision was recorded. For Scott Andrew Marriott, the sentence was imposed and recorded. The case involving Skye Kory and Jace Schick was concluded, and the court's decision on the legal proceedings was recorded. For Kyam Keith Broadby, the directions provided by the Court of Criminal Appeal were recorded, and the case was managed accordingly. Similarly, for Dean Phillip Braslin and Philip James Airey, the directions provided by the court were recorded, and the case proceeded as directed. The directions provided by the Court of Criminal Appeal for Kevin Michael Phillips and Bryce Robert Richardson were recorded, and the case was managed in accordance with those directions. For Tobias Oddie-Jones and Ashley Dean Brown, the court's judgment on the sentencing submissions was recorded. The case involving Clinton Anthony Williams and Peter Stanley Cormie was concluded, and the plea was recorded. Sentencing submissions for Shayden James Cowen were considered, and the court's judgment was recorded. For Leon Jeffrey Watts, the judgment for the part-heard trial was issued. The directions provided by the Court of Criminal Appeal for Kyam Keith Broadby were recorded, and the case was managed in accordance with those directions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.