Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Wednesday, 2 August 2017

Case [2017] TASSCCourtlist 177


AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FOR WEDNESDAY, 2 AUGUST 2017

AMENDED LIST FOR BURNIE

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Matthew Allan Ward

For Trial
Stuart Malcom Allen
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence by video-link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
JPRB   

For Sentence
Dale Reginald Loone

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
DBL    
(Part Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Bail Application

James Michael Fitzgerald
Nathan Alen Denny-Garrett
Michael Miller

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Dismiss Action
Juliet Fisher
v
Susie Riddoch

2:15 p.m.
Security for Costs
Jane Holden
v
The State of Tasmania

LAUNCESTON
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Sentence by video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
JPRB

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
A Witness
Jamie Lee Vimpany

To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Carly Ann Dekkers
Christopher John Humphreys
Malcolm Joshua Mayne
Caine Robert Richardson
Sean Gregory Richardson
Matthew Luke Williams

4:00pm For Plea
John Selwyn Statton

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.
For Trial
MPB
(part-heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Wednesday, 2 August 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 177
Case
[2017] TASSCCourtlist 177
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Wednesday, 2 August 2017, detail various cases scheduled for that day. These cases span both criminal and civil jurisdictions, with hearings and trials occurring in both Hobart and Launceston. Notable cases include the trial of Stuart Malcom Allen in Hobart, which was partially heard, and the case of Jane Holden versus the State of Tasmania, which involved a security for costs application.

The legal issues in these cases varied widely. In the criminal cases, issues ranged from bail applications to sentencing and trials. For instance, the bail application for James Michael Fitzgerald, Nathan Alen Denny-Garrett, and Michael Miller required the court to assess the likelihood of the defendants appearing in court, the risk of reoffending, and any potential danger to the community. The civil case between Juliet Fisher and Susie Riddoch involved a dismissal action, potentially raising issues of contract law, breach of contract, or jurisdictional challenges.

The reasoning and outcomes of these cases were not detailed in the law lists. However, the scheduling and partial hearings suggest that the court was actively managing the cases, potentially issuing interim decisions or rulings. For instance, the partial hearing of the trial for Carly Ann Dekkers, Christopher John Humphreys, Malcolm Joshua Mayne Caine, Robert Richardson, Sean Gregory Richardson, and Matthew Luke Williams indicates that the court had already engaged with the case, possibly ruling on procedural aspects or evidentiary issues.

In summary, the amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania on 2 August 2017 reflect a range of criminal and civil cases, each with its own set of legal issues. The court's scheduling and partial hearings suggest an active management of these cases, potentially leading to interim decisions or rulings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.