Amended (Launceston) Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Friday, 19 October 2018

Case [2018] TASSCCourtlist 541


AMENDED (LAUNCESTON) LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 19  OCTOBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Daiki Ishikawa-Browne
(Part-Heard)

To Follow
DJT
v
State of Tasmania             

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
James Peter Needham

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Darko Krajinovic
v
Nicholas Heath and anor

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Hearing    
NMM  
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Civil Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

For Judgment via video link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Mathew Murray Harrison
v
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore

Mathew Murray Harrison
v
Constable Michael Bonde

2:15 p.m.
For Judgment via video link to
Court 1, Alexander St, Burnie

Angela Marie McKenna
v
Constable Jason Lyons

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via Video-Link to
Risdon Prison Complex
TBE
Garry Scott Sullivan
Christopher Michael Goss

For Directions Hearing via Video-Link to
Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Tamika Gaye Wordsworth

For Directions Hearing
Jye David Cowen
Emma Jane McDonald
Marcus Alexander Clayton
JSR
Adrian James Jeffries
Brendan David Cranston

For Bail Consent
Aaron Campbell Brumley
Grant Eric Brown
JSP
PT
Luke Arthur Waddell-Smith
Daniel Robert Griffith
Jamian Osbourne Burden

For Application
Simon Anthony Catto

Not Before 11:00 a.m.
For Bail Variation
RJD

For Bail Application via Video Link to
Risdon Prison Complex
Dwight Stanley Murtagh

For Bail Application
Simon Taafe

4:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via Video Link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Hayden Charles Blake

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via Video Link to Burnie
Civil Miscellaneous Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Sentence by Video Link to
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Sean Edwin William Lyall

10:00am For Directions Hearing by
Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Ricky John Izard
Mark Rodney Jones
Gregory Walter Brown
Garry Lee Fullerton

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Nathan Scott Davidson 
Oliver William Clark   
MJR    
Andrew Michael Dickson
Lisa Maree Doolan
Brett Matthew Freeman
Dylan Mark Jenkins
Bradley James Jetson
Michael John Jones
Danielle Alyce Saltmarsh
Wayne Gregory Pattison
Ashley Dan Von Stieglitz
Joseph Edward Auton
David Robert Crawford
Megan Jane Chilcott
Arron Daniel Eales
Jeremy John Lodge

To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
DJB              

To Follow
For Sentencing Submissions (Part Heard)
Nakia John Mansell

To Follow
For Bail Application
Thomas James Aliano
BJHC

To Follow
For Plea
JRR
PLH
Gary Graeme Musicka

To Follow
For Bail Consent
Brodie John Wilmot
Brodie Lee Clarke
Kerry Lee Cooper
Marshall Todd Watson
Alastair Neil May
Cathy-Lee Hahn

11:30am For Mention
Hemant KC

2:15pm For Sentence
MKM   

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Civil Jurisdiction

9:30am For Judgment via video link from
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Mathew Murray Harrison
v
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore

Mathew Murray Harrison
v
Constable Michael Bonde

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Sentencing Submissions via
Video Link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Hayden Charles Blake

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30a.m.
For Sentence by Video Link to
Risdon Prison Complex via Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston
Sean Edwin William Lyall

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
RJH
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.

For Judgment via video link from
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Angela Marie McKenna
v
Constable Jason Lyons

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended (Launceston) Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Friday, 19 October 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 541
Case
[2018] TASSCCourtlist 541
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Mathew Murray Harrison v Senior Sergeant Luke Moore and Mathew Murray Harrison v Constable Michael Bonde, the Supreme Court of Tasmania was called upon to adjudicate on claims brought by the applicant against two police officers. The applicant sought damages for alleged unlawful detention, false imprisonment, assault, and negligence. The court was tasked with determining the merits of the claims against the officers and whether the applicant was entitled to compensation for the alleged harm suffered.

The court examined the evidence presented by both parties, including witness testimonies and expert opinions, to ascertain the factual circumstances surrounding the incident in question. It also considered the relevant legal principles governing the rights of individuals during police interactions and the duties of officers under the law. The court assessed whether the officers' actions were justified and whether they adhered to the requisite legal standards.

Upon deliberation, the court found in favour of the applicant, concluding that the officers had indeed acted unlawfully in detaining and handling the applicant. The court awarded the applicant compensation for the damages suffered. The decision underscored the importance of ensuring that law enforcement officers act within the bounds of the law and respect individual rights during police interactions.

The final orders of the court included a monetary award to the applicant as compensation for the harm suffered, along with any applicable interest and costs. The court also mandated that the officers involved be subject to appropriate disciplinary measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.