Amended (Burnie) Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 6 May 2019 Summary

AMENDED (BURNIE) LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 6 MAY 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Stephanie Rose Lewis-Gumley
Christopher Lewis Emery

For Trial
ALS

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Christopher Michael Goss

For Sentence
Peter Glenn Howlett

For Bail Application
Floyd Dillon Mansfield
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Remittal Application via Video Link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Braydon Leigh Hopkinson

For Mention
Jodie Kay Moffatt
Douglas James McIntyre
Lesley Carol McIntyre
Michelle Marree Woolley
Malcolm John Pilgrim

10:30 a.m.
For Trial
Cameron James Riley
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Justin Andrew Leary

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

9:15 a.m.
For Directions Hearing telephone
Andrew Slater v Christine Radford

9:45 a.m.
For Directions Hearing telephone
Hookway Aerospace Pty Limited (In liquidation)
v Stirling Hookway

2:15 p.m.

Chamber matters

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Jamie Lowe

To Follow
For Legal Argument
GAW

4:15pm For Directions Hearing
AJC

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction

11:00am For Motion to Review
CMA
v
Anthony Roughan

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. not before 2:00 p.m.
For Bail Consent
Ryan Andrew Shackcloth

2:00 p.m.
For Trial
Darren Ward Gale
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
CJW
AGM

For Sentence via video link to
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Angus Robert Carmelo Souter

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details

AGLC: Amended (Burnie) Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 6 May 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 94
Case: [2019] TASSCCourtlist 94
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania on 6 May 2019 indicate a busy schedule of hearings across various jurisdictions and courts. The criminal division in Hobart had cases involving Stephanie Rose Lewis-Gumley, Christopher Lewis Emery, and others, with proceedings ranging from trials to sentence hearings and bail applications. In Launceston, the court had a mix of criminal and civil cases, including a mention for Jamie Lowe and a directions hearing for Hookway Aerospace Pty Limited against Stirling Hookway. Burnie's court list featured criminal proceedings, including a bail consent hearing for Ryan Andrew Shackcloth and a trial for Darren Ward Gale.

The legal issues before the court involved a variety of criminal matters, including bail applications, sentencing, and trials, as well as civil proceedings such as directions hearings and motions to review. The cases required the court to determine appropriate bail conditions, sentences, and the validity of legal arguments in both criminal and civil contexts. The court's decisions would hinge on the evidence presented, the legal arguments, and the application of relevant laws and precedents.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the law lists, which primarily served as a schedule of proceedings. The judges would have considered the specifics of each case during the hearings, applying relevant legal principles to reach decisions on bail, sentences, and other matters. The final orders would be documented in the respective case files and could include decisions on bail conditions, sentences, or the dismissal or continuation of trials.

No specific final orders were provided in the law lists, as these would depend on the outcomes of the individual hearings. Each case would have its unique set of findings and decisions, which would be communicated to the parties involved and documented in the court records.

Orders