[2013] FWCA 8572 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Amcor Packaging (Australia) Ltd T/A Amcor Beverage Cans Ballarat
(AG2013/10954)
AMCOR BEVERAGE CANS - AUSTRALASIA, BALLARAT END PLANT, EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT, 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 30 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Amcor Beverage Cans - Australasia, Ballarat End Plant, Employee Collective Agreement, 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Amcor Beverage Cans - Australasia, Ballarat End Plant, Employee Collective Agreement, 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by Amcor Packaging (Australia) Ltd T/A Amcor Beverage Cans Ballarat. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 6 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE405099 PR544011>
- AGLC
- Amcor Packaging (Australia) Ltd T/A Amcor Beverage Cans Ballarat [2013] FWCA 8572
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8572
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. Key points of contention were provisions related to the classification and remuneration of employees, the process for resolving disputes, and the inclusion of specific terms that Amcor Packaging argued were not adequately supported by employee input or consultation. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval and if it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.
The Commission examined the evidence and submissions from both parties, considering the legal framework governing employee agreements. It found that the agreement generally met the statutory requirements, although some minor amendments were necessary to ensure compliance. The Commission approved the agreement with modifications, concluding that the changes were in the interests of the employees and the employer and did not undermine the overall fairness of the agreement. The Court made specific orders for the implementation of the approved agreement, ensuring that the changes were reflected in the final document.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.