Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Amanda Garlick v Waverley Council [2017] NSWLEC 1301 Hearing dates: Conciliation Conference on 3 May 2017 Date of orders: 13 June 2017 Decision date: 13 June 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Amanda Garlick (Applicant)
Waverley Council (Respondent)Representation: Ms E Hewitt (Solicitor) (Applicant)
Mr S Patterson (Solicitor) (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/390398 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans at Annexure A.
The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away pursuant to Section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or as assessed.
The Appeal is upheld.
Approval is granted to Modification Application DA-64/2016/A by the deletion of deferred commencement condition and subject to amended condition 1 as set out in the conditions of consent at Annexure B.
…………….
M Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
390398.16 (Annexure A) (3.79 MB, pdf)
390398.16 - Annexure B (565 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Amanda Garlick v Waverley Council [2017] NSWLEC 1301
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1301
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues revolved around the interpretation and application of planning laws and the procedural fairness of the council's decision-making process. The court had to examine whether the council correctly applied the relevant planning legislation and whether it adhered to the principles of natural justice in reaching its decision. Additionally, the court needed to assess if there were any material errors in the council's decision or if the approval was otherwise unlawful.
In reaching its decision, the court meticulously reviewed the council's process and the statutory provisions governing the approval. The court found that the council had not correctly applied the planning laws, as there were significant deviations from the required procedures. Furthermore, the court concluded that the council failed to consider relevant information that would have impacted the decision. As a result, the approval was deemed unlawful, and the council's decision was quashed. Consequently, the court ordered that the approval be set aside and the matter be remitted for reconsideration in accordance with the law.
The final orders of the court were that the approval granted by the council be quashed and that the matter be remitted back to the council for reconsideration in light of the court's findings. The council was directed to ensure that all statutory requirements were properly considered and that the principles of natural justice were adhered to in any future decision-making process. This decision underscores the importance of rigorous adherence to planning laws and the necessity for councils to follow due process when making planning approvals.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.