| [2020] FWCA 1696 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Amalgamated Casket Company Pty Ltd
(AG2020/632)
AMALGAMATED CASKET COMPANY PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 30 MARCH 2020 |
Application for approval of the Amalgamated Casket Company Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019.
[1] Application has been made by Amalgamated Casket Company Pty Ltd for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Amalgamated Casket Company Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the Agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 April 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2022.
[5] The Australian Workers’ Union is covered by the Agreement.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE507608 PR717922>
- AGLC
- Amalgamated Casket Company Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 1696
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 1696
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the provisions in question were procedurally and substantively fair, and whether they complied with the relevant statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The court had to determine whether the provisions met the 'better off overall test', which assesses whether employees would be better off with the new agreement than they would be under the applicable award or safety net. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for appropriate processes for dispute resolution.
The court found that the provisions in the agreement were procedurally fair, as they were made in good faith and the bargaining process was conducted appropriately. The court also determined that the provisions met the better off overall test, as employees would receive a pay increase and other benefits that outweighed any potential detriments. The court concluded that the agreement complied with the statutory requirements and was thus approved. The decision was made in the context of ensuring that the terms and conditions of employment provided a fair and equitable outcome for both the employees and the employer.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.