ALPRESS & FEENEY
Case
•
[2014] FCCA 521
•11 March 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
ALPRESS & FEENEY [2014] FCCA 521
[2014] FCCA 521
11 March 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Alpress, sought leave from the Federal Circuit Court to make a determination regarding child support payments under sections 98S or 116 of the *Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989* (Cth). The application concerned child support periods that fell between 18 months and seven years prior to the date of the application. Feeney was the respondent in these proceedings.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to be granted leave to proceed with the determination application, specifically addressing the question of whether there had been an unwarrantable delay in bringing the application and if any explanation provided for such delay was satisfactory.
Judge Scarlett found that there had been an unwarrantable delay in the applicant bringing the application for leave. The Court determined that the applicant had failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for this delay. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for leave.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to be granted leave to proceed with the determination application, specifically addressing the question of whether there had been an unwarrantable delay in bringing the application and if any explanation provided for such delay was satisfactory.
Judge Scarlett found that there had been an unwarrantable delay in the applicant bringing the application for leave. The Court determined that the applicant had failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for this delay. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for leave.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Limitation Periods
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
ALPRESS & FEENEY [2014] FCCA 521
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Ozone Theatres (Aust) Ltd
[1949] HCA 33
Re Commonwealth of Australia; Ex Parte Marks
[2000] HCA 67