[2013] FWCA 7711 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Alligator Constructions Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2977)
ALLIGATOR CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2017
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER MACDONALD | SYDNEY, 3 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Alligator Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Alligator Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017 (“the Agreement”). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”). The application has been made by Alligator Constructions Pty Ltd (“the applicant”). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 relevant to this application for approval has been met. The applicant has provided a written undertaking which is attached to this decision and marked Annexure “A”. I note that, under s.191 of the Act, the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date is 10 October 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code {G}, AE404557 PR542819>
ANNEXURE “A”
- AGLC
- Alligator Constructions Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 7711
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7711
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Court were whether the Enterprise Agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, including the requirement that the agreement must be in writing, provide for a direct and genuine bargaining process, and not contain any terms that would have an adverse effect on employees. The Court also needed to determine if the agreement met the statutory requirement of "no disadvantage" by comparing it to the relevant award or safety net.
The Court examined the agreement's content and found it to be in compliance with the Fair Work Act. The agreement was determined to be in writing, a result of direct and genuine bargaining, and did not contain any terms that would have an adverse effect on employees. The Court also concluded that the agreement did not result in any employee being worse off in terms of pay and conditions compared to the relevant award or safety net. Consequently, the Court approved the Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017.
The Court ordered that the Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017 be approved, and it would take effect from the date of the Court's decision. The agreement would then be registered with the Fair Work Commission, making it a legally binding contract between the employer and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.