| [2020] FWCA 6856 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Allied Pinnacle Pty Limited
(AG2020/3703)
ALLIED PINNACLE PICTON ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019 - 2022
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOYCE | SYDNEY, 17 DECEMBER 2020 |
Application for approval of the Allied Pinnacle Picton Enterprise Agreement 2019 - 2022.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement to be known as the Allied Pinnacle Picton Enterprise Agreement 2019 - 2022 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Allied Pinnacle Pty Limited (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[3] I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[4] The United Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 December 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 October 2022.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE509857 PR725577>
- AGLC
- Allied Pinnacle Pty Limited [2020] FWCA 6856
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 6856
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the provisions in question complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the union argued that some clauses did not meet the standard of being "better off overall or at least no worse off" as mandated by the legislation. The union further contended that certain provisions did not adhere to the principles of good faith bargaining and procedural fairness.
The Commission examined the provisions in question, considering the relevant statutory requirements and the broader context of the agreement. It was found that while the majority of the agreement complied with the legislative standards, a few provisions did not meet the statutory threshold for being "better off overall or at least no worse off." However, the Commission determined that these non-compliant provisions did not undermine the overall fairness of the agreement. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement, subject to the non-compliant provisions being revised to align with the legislative requirements.
The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the Allied Pinnacle Picton Enterprise Agreement 2019-2022, with a directive for the applicant to amend the identified non-compliant provisions within a specified timeframe. The union's objections were dismissed as the overall fairness and compliance of the agreement were upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.