Legal Research
Cases
Alliance Network Infrastructure Pty Limited

Alliance Network Infrastructure Pty Limited

Case [2022] FWCA 2109

Jurisdiction

Collective Bargaining

Enterprise Agreement

Employment & Labour Law

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

[2022] FWCA 2109

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Alliance Network Infrastructure Pty Limited

(AG2022/1929)

Alliance Network Infrastructure Pty Ltd Single Enterprise Agreement 2021

Electrical contracting industry
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON	SYDNEY, 27 JUNE 2022

Application for approval of the Alliance Network Infrastructure Pty Ltd Single Enterprise Agreement 2021.

Alliance Network Infrastructure Pty Limited has applied for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Alliance Network Infrastructure Pty Ltd Single Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement).

I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

The Agreement is approved and will operate from 4 July 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 26 June 2026.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Details

AGLC: Alliance Network Infrastructure Pty Limited [2022] FWCA 2109
Case: [2022] FWCA 2109
Decision Date: 27 JUNE 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Alliance Network Infrastructure Pty Limited sought approval of a single enterprise agreement from the Fair Work Commission. The application was made by the employer, who submitted that the agreement would provide for a fair and efficient workplace. The employee representatives, who had entered into the agreement, did not oppose the application. The legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission found that the agreement was in accordance with the Act and provided for fair and reasonable terms for the employees. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a number of benefits, including wage increases and improvements to working conditions. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and approved the application.

The Commission considered the submissions made by both parties and reviewed the contents of the agreement. The employer argued that the agreement provided for a fair and efficient workplace, while the employee representatives did not oppose the application. The Commission found that the agreement met the requirements of the Act and provided for fair and reasonable terms for the employees. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for wage increases and improvements to working conditions, which were beneficial to the employees. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and approved the application for approval of the agreement. The employer may now implement the terms of the agreement, subject to any further orders made by the Commission.

Orders