[2013] FWCA 7942 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
All Engineering Services Pty Ltd
(AG2013/9721)
ALL ENGINEERING SERVICES PTY LTD (LAMBTON & TOMAGO SITES) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER MACDONALD | SYDNEY, 11 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the All Engineering Services Pty Ltd (Lambton & Tomago Sites) Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the All Engineering Services Pty Ltd (Lambton & Tomago Sites) Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made by All Engineering Services Pty Ltd pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved in accordance with s.54 of the Act and will operate from 18 October 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 25 May 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code {C}, AE404691 PR543116>
- AGLC
- All Engineering Services Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 7942
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 7942
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission involved whether the enterprise agreement complied with the statutory requirements for good faith bargaining and whether it adequately protected the rights and interests of the employees. Additionally, the court had to assess whether the agreement was procedurally sound and whether it provided fair terms for the employees, including minimum wage rates, leave entitlements, and other working conditions.
In its decision, the Commission noted that the application met the procedural requirements as stipulated by the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission found that the parties had engaged in good faith bargaining, evidenced by the detailed negotiation records and the willingness of both sides to reach a consensus. The agreement was deemed to provide fair and reasonable terms for the employees, including provisions that met or exceeded the minimum standards prescribed by the relevant awards. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement, finding it to be fair and balanced in addressing the interests of both the employer and the employees. The approval was granted on the condition that the agreement would come into effect on a specified date, subject to certain transitional provisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.