| [2022] FWC 2825 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Alixandra Jane Scolari
v
Stewart Vidler- Executive Principal, Coonamble High School
(U2022/9680)
| COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 21 OCTOBER 2022 |
Application for relief from unfair dismissal- national system employer – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative.
On 29 September 2022 Ms Alixandra Jane Scolari made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).
On 3 October 2022 the Commission attempted to contact Ms Scolari via her nominated telephone number to discuss her application. Ms Scolari did not answer the call. A voicemail message was left advising Ms Scolari that Coonamble High School did not appear to be a national system employer and that she may be ineligible to make an application for unfair dismissal remedy. The Commission also recommended that Ms Scolari contact the Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales for further advice.
Later that day, the Commission emailed correspondence to Ms Scolari’s nominated email address advising that based on the information contained in the application, Coonamble High School may not be a national system employer and to urgently seek further advice on this issue, as the Commission may not have jurisdiction to deal with her application. The correspondence also required Ms Scolari to advise the Commission within 14 days whether she wished to proceed with her application and warned that the application may be dismissed if no response was received.
On 5 October 2022 Ms Scolari contacted the Commission and was advised that Coonamble High School may not be a national system employer and therefore may not fall within the Commission’s jurisdiction. Ms Scolari was provided with contact details for the Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales. Ms Scolari confirmed that she would contact them and notify the Commission about whether she would continue with her application.
As Ms Scolari did not advise the Commission as required, on 17 October 2022 the Commission attempted to contact Ms Scolari on her nominated telephone number. Ms Scolari did not answer the call. A voicemail message was left requesting that Ms Scolari advise the Commission about whether she wanted to continue with her application and that the application may be dismissed if no response was received by the end of the day.
To date, Ms Scolari has not provided any further information.
Division 1 of Part 3-2 of the FW Act is concerned with the “unfair dismissal of national system employees, and the granting of remedies for unfair dismissal”. Further, s.380 of the FW Act provides that, under this Part, an “employee means a national system employee, and employer means a national system employer”. Ms Scolari and Stewart Vidler- Executive Principal, Coonamble High School do not respectively fall within the scope of this definition.
Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides as follows:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.
In this circumstance, I am satisfied that the Commission has no jurisdiction to determine Ms Scolari’s application for unfair dismissal as her employment was not with a national system employer and therefore, application was not made in accordance with the FW Act.,
The application is dismissed under s.587(1)(c) of the FW Act. An order[1] giving effect to this decision will be issued shortly.
COMMISSIONER
[1] PR747057
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR747056>
- AGLC
- Alixandra Jane Scolari v Stewart Vidler- Executive Principal, Coonamble High School [2022] FWC 2825
- Case
- [2022] FWC 2825
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the Commission was whether Ms Scolari's application met the jurisdictional criteria outlined in Division 1 of Part 3-2 of the Fair Work Act, which pertains to unfair dismissal of national system employees. Given that Coonamble High School was not identified as a national system employer, the Commission needed to determine if it had the authority to proceed with Ms Scolari's application. The Commission was also required to consider whether the application was frivolous, vexatious, or lacked a reasonable prospect of success under Section 587(1) of the FW Act.
Commissioner Bissett found that the Commission did not have jurisdiction to hear Ms Scolari's application because Coonamble High School was not a national system employer, and thus her employment did not fall under the definition of a national system employee. The application did not comply with the requirements of the Fair Work Act, leading the Commissioner to conclude that the application had no reasonable prospect of success. Consequently, the application was dismissed under Section 587(1)(c) of the FW Act. An order formalising this decision was issued by the Commission.
The final orders of the Commission reflect the dismissal of Ms Scolari's application on jurisdictional grounds and the lack of reasonable prospect of success. This decision underscores the importance of jurisdictional criteria in employment law matters and the need for applicants to ensure their employers fall within the specified definitions to avail themselves of remedies under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.