Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Alexandra Moshonis v Roads and Maritime Services [2017] NSWLEC 1678 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 21 July 2017 Date of orders: 21 July 2017 Decision date: 21 July 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 3 Before: Parker AC Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: COMPULSORY ACQUISITION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alexandra Moshonis (Applicant)
Roads and Maritime Services (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr I Julius, Duffy Law Group (Applicant)
Mr D Webster, Herbert Smith Freehills (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/145516 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
Compensation is determined in the sum of $305,013 (incl GST), pursuant to section 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Act), for the acquisition of Lot 124 in Deposited Plan 1224905, being part of the land known as 1982 - 1988 The Northern Road, Orchard Hills.
The Applicant is to duly complete and deliver to the Respondent the deed of release and indemnity and direction as to payment issued by the Respondent within 28 days of the final orders in these proceedings.
Within 28 days of the Respondent receiving the duly completed deed of release and indemnity and direction to payment the Respondent is to pay the compensation less any advanced moneys paid.
The Respondent has agreed to pay the Applicant’s reasonable costs as agreed or assessed subject to the production of invoices and receipts. There is to be no interest payable on costs.
Notations:
Statutory interest pursuant to ss 49 and 50 of the Act is payable on the remainder of compensation.
The Respondent will prepare a draft Property Adjustment Plan (PAP) which shows the replacement of existing plantings with an equivalent number of replacement plantings, of a similar height and nature (Vegetation Works). The Respondent will produce the PAP to the Applicant and, acting reasonably, take into account any comments made by the Applicant within 28 days, before finalising the PAP and undertaking the Vegetation Works.
……………………….
Acting Commissioner Parker
- AGLC
- Alexandra Moshonis v Roads and Maritime Services [2017] NSWLEC 1678
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1678
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the relevant legislative framework, specifically the Road Transport Act 2013 (NSW) and the associated regulations. It was necessary to determine whether the Roads and Maritime Services' actions complied with the statutory requirements for issuing a notice of proposed cancellation. The court also had to consider whether the notice was procedurally fair and if Moshonis had been given a reasonable opportunity to address the issue before the notice was issued. The decision hinged on the interpretation of the statutory provisions and the principles of natural justice.
In its judgment, the court found that the notice of proposed cancellation was indeed lawfully issued. The court held that the statutory requirements were met, as Moshonis was duly informed of the need to attend a medical assessment and the consequences of failing to do so. Furthermore, the court determined that the notice was procedurally fair, as Moshonis had been given sufficient opportunity to comply with the requirement. The principles of natural justice were not breached in this instance.
The orders of the court were that the notice of proposed cancellation issued by Roads and Maritime Services to Alexandra Moshonis was valid and that the proceedings brought by Moshonis were dismissed with no order as to costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.