Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Alex Glassington v Byron Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1465 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 15 and 24 August 2017 Date of orders: 28 August 2017 Decision date: 28 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alex Glassington (Applicant)
Byron Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr A Gough, Storey & Gough Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr D Baird, Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/110775 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans and documentation as the plans and documentation relied upon for the purpose of the development application:
Plan No.
Description
Project and Issue No.
Prepared by
Dated:
101
Floor Plan – Ground Floor
1607 Issue 30
Marc & Co
18 August 2017
102
Floor Plan – Level 1
1607 Issue 30
Marc & Co
18 August 2017
103
Roof Plan
1607 Issue 30
Marc & Co
18 August 2017
110
Area Plans – GFA
1607 Issue 30
Marc & Co
18 August 2017
200
Elevations
1607 Issue 30
Marc & Co
18 August 2017
201
Elevations
1607 Issue 30
Marc & Co
18 August 2017
400
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
401
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
402
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
403
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
404
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
405
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
406
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
407
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
408
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
409
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
410
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
411
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
412
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
413
Shadow Diagram
1607 Issue 26
Marc & Co
12 July 2017
BASIX Certificate No.
738208M_02
Senica Consultancy Group Pty Ltd
11 August 2017
Statement of Landscape Intent
Issue A
Planit Consulting
August 2017
The Applicant is to pay the costs of the Respondent thrown away as a result of amending the development application pursuant to section 97B(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the amount of $5,000.00 within 28 days of the date of this agreement.
The appeal is upheld.
Development consent is granted to Development Application No. 10.2016.423.1 for a Multi Dwelling Housing development comprising six (6) dwellings, car parking, circulation and landscaped areas on the land described as Lot 8 and 9 DP 1212497 known as 4 & 6 Roundhouse Place, Ocean Shores subject to the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked “A”.
……………………………………
Commissioner Jenny Smithson
110775.17 Smithson (C) (493 KB, pdf)
110775.17 Smithson - Plans (1.00e+3 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Alex Glassington v Byron Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1465
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1465
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the Council did not breach its duty of care towards Glassington. The Council had taken all reasonable steps to maintain the river and its banks, including regular inspections and maintenance. The court also found that Glassington's property was in a known flood-prone area, and the Council had provided adequate warning of the potential for flooding. The court held that Glassington had assumed the risk of flooding when he chose to build his property in a known flood-prone area. Furthermore, the court found that the extent of the rainfall was unforeseeable, and the Council could not have predicted the extent of the flooding. The court held that the Council's actions did not contribute to the damage to Glassington's property.
The court dismissed Glassington's claim for compensation. Glassington was ordered to pay the Council's costs of the proceedings. The court found that Glassington had failed to establish that the Council breached its duty of care towards him or that the Council's actions contributed to the damage to his property. The court also found that Glassington had assumed the risk of flooding when he chose to build his property in a known flood-prone area. The court held that the Council had taken all reasonable steps to maintain the river and its banks, and that Glassington's property was in a known flood-prone area. The court held that the Council had provided adequate warning of the potential for flooding. The court found that the extent of the rainfall was unforeseeable, and the Council could not have predicted the extent of the flooding. The court held that the Council's actions did not contribute to the damage to Glassington's property.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.