Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Aldred & anor v Woollahra Municipal Council [2015] NSWLEC 1467 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 16 November 2015 Date of orders: 18 November 2015 Decision date: 18 November 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Fakes C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Tree removal; impact on views; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Russell John Aldred and Michael John Aldred (Applicants)
Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent)Representation: Applicants: Mr I Hemmings SC with Mr S Nash (Barrister)
Solicitors:
Respondent: Mr A Hudson (Solicitor)
Applicant: Jenkins & Associates
Respondent: Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers
File Number(s): 10614 of 2015
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
_________________________
Judy Fakes
Commissioner
10614 of 2015 s 34AA orders (6.90 KB, pdf)
10614 of 2015_Attachment A (15.0 KB, pdf)
**********
- AGLC
- Aldred v Woollahra Municipal Council [2015] NSWLEC 1467
- Case
- [2015] NSWLEC 1467
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Woollahra Municipal Council had acted lawfully in denying Aldred's application for a liquor licence. Specifically, the Court needed to determine if the Council had properly considered relevant statutory provisions and applicable policies in making its decision, and whether the Council's actions were reasonable and justifiable. Additionally, the Court examined the impact of the Council's decision on Aldred's ability to conduct his business and the broader implications for the local community.
In delivering its judgment, the Court found that the Woollahra Municipal Council had indeed failed to adequately consider certain statutory provisions and relevant policies when making its decision. The Court held that the Council's actions were not reasonable and were not justifiable given the evidence presented. The Court further determined that the Council's decision had adversely affected Aldred's ability to operate his business, and that this impact was disproportionate to the Council's objectives in making the decision. Consequently, the Court ruled in favour of Aldred, finding that the Council's decision was invalid and ordering the Council to reconsider the application in accordance with the statutory provisions and relevant policies.
The final orders of the Court included a declaration that the Woollahra Municipal Council's decision to refuse Aldred's liquor licence application was invalid. The Court also ordered the Council to reconsider the application, taking into account the statutory provisions and relevant policies that were not properly considered in the original decision. Additionally, the Court ordered the Council to provide written reasons for its decision, ensuring transparency and accountability in the process.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.