[2013] FWCA 3844 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
ALDI Foods Pty Limited
(AG2013/319)
ALDI STAPYLTON AGREEMENT 2012
Retail industry | |
JUSTICE BOULTON, SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT | SYDNEY, 17 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of the ALDI Stapylton Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ALDI Stapylton Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] Further to my decision of 3 June 2013, 1 ALDI Foods Pty Ltd provided a proposed employer undertaking in relation to the Agreement. On 7 June 2013, my chambers provided the proposed undertaking to and sought the views of all persons who the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) knows to be bargaining representatives for the Agreement, namely, the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (SDA), the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU), and Ms Lynette Pearson. The bargaining representatives were informed that if they wished to make their views known to the Commission, they should provide a response in writing by 14 June 2013.
[3] No bargaining representative responded to express a view in relation to the proposed undertaking.
[4] I am satisfied that the undertaking addresses the concern expressed in the decision in relation to the clauses of the Agreement relating to payment for leave, 2 and that it will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement or result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertaking has been attached to the Agreement and will be taken to be a term of the Agreement pursuant to s.191 of the Act.
[5] For all of the reasons set out above and in my decision of 3 June 2013, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 that are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[6] The SDA and the TWU, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the organisations.
[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 24 June 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 June 2017.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
2 Ibid at [68]-[73].
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE401811 PR537895>
- AGLC
- ALDI Foods Pty Limited [2013] FWCA 3844
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3844
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues the Commission had to address were whether the proposed agreement provided for fair and better terms and conditions, and whether it complied with the procedural requirements of the Act. This included an assessment of whether the agreement had been made in good faith and whether it contained the necessary provisions for dispute resolution. The Commission also had to consider the impact of the agreement on the employees it covered, including whether it provided adequate protections and benefits.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the ALDI Stapylton Agreement 2012 did provide for fair and better terms and conditions than the applicable awards. The Commission noted that the agreement included provisions for reasonable working hours, adequate leave entitlements, and competitive wage rates, which were better than those provided by the relevant awards. Additionally, the Commission was satisfied that the agreement had been made in good faith and complied with the procedural requirements of the Act. The Commission approved the agreement on the basis that it provided for fair and better terms and conditions and was in compliance with the Act.
The Commission made orders approving the ALDI Stapylton Agreement 2012, effective from the date of the decision. The agreement was to apply to the specified employees of ALDI in Stapylton and would remain in force until such time as it was varied or replaced by a new agreement. The orders also provided for the agreement to be registered with the Fair Work Commission, making it a registered agreement under the Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.