| [2014] FWCA 9434 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Albury Wodonga Health (Wodonga Campus); Echuca Regional Health; Northeast Health Wangaratta; Peninsula Health; South West Healthcare
(AG2014/10812)
VICTORIAN STAND-ALONE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRES (DENTAL THERAPISTS, DENTAL HYGIENISTS AND ORAL HEALTH THERAPISTS’) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2017 (NO. 2).
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON | MELBOURNE, 24 DECEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Victorian Stand-Alone Community Health Centres (Dental Therapists, Dental Hygienists and Oral Health Therapists’) Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017 (No. 2).
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Victorian Stand-Alone Community Health Centres (Dental Therapists, Dental Hygienists and Oral Health Therapists’) Enterprise Agreement 2013-2017 (No. 2), (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Albury Wodonga Health, Echuca Regional Health, Northeast Health Wangaratta, Peninsula Health, and South West Healthcare. The agreement is a mulit-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The agreement does not contain a model consultation term compliant with the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 31 December 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 May 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE412019 PR559564>
- AGLC
- Albury Wodonga Health (Wodonga Campus); Echuca Regional Health; Northeast Health Wangaratta; Peninsula Health; South West Healthcare [2014] FWCA 9434
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 9434
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission undertook a comprehensive analysis of the proposed agreement, comparing it against the relevant awards and assessing its impact on the employees' financial conditions. The Commission found that the proposed agreement did indeed meet the BOOT, as it provided for certain improvements in remuneration and conditions for the employees. Notably, the agreement introduced higher pay rates and additional benefits, which were deemed to be sufficient to satisfy the BOOT. The Commission also considered the broader context of the healthcare sector and the need for improved workforce conditions to support the delivery of quality healthcare services.
Having concluded that the agreement met the statutory requirements, the Commission approved the application. The decision was made on the basis that the proposed agreement provided for improved conditions for the employees, without adversely affecting their financial position, and thus met the criteria under the Fair Work Act. This approval ensures that the terms of the enterprise agreement will apply to the relevant employees, providing them with the benefits outlined in the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.