| [2017] FWCA 2025 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Albem Operations Pty Ltd
(AG2017/1175)
ALBEM OPERATIONS PTY LTD GENERAL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER HUNT | BRISBANE, 10 APRIL 2017 |
Application for variation of the Albem Operations Pty Ltd General Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for variation of the Albem Operations Pty Ltd General Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Albem Operations Pty Ltd (the Employer).
[2] The Employer filed a statutory declaration in support of the application which was declared by Elisha McLoughlin, Office Manager of the Employer.
[3] The variation can be found at Annexure A to this decision.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met. Of particular note, I am satisfied that the variations at Annexure A continue to satisfy the terms of Part 2-2, the National Employment Standards of the Act, and the Better off Overall Test pursuant to s.193(1) of the Act. The requirements in Regulation 2.09A of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 for the signing of a variation to the enterprise agreement have been met.
[5] The variation to the Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation will operate from 10 April 2017.
[6] The consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE422270 PR591749>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Albem Operations Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 2025
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 2025
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were justifiable under the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether they met the requirements of good faith bargaining. Specifically, the Commission had to assess if the changes were necessary to ensure the enterprise remained competitive and viable, and whether they provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees. The Commission also had to consider the principles of good faith bargaining as mandated by the Fair Work Act.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission acknowledged the need for the enterprise to remain competitive in a challenging economic environment. The Commission carefully weighed the evidence presented by both parties, including submissions on the financial viability of the company and the impact of the proposed changes on employees. Ultimately, the Commission found that the changes were necessary for the enterprise's sustainability and that they provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees. The Commission concluded that the proposed changes met the criteria for a variation under the Fair Work Act, and approved the application for variation of the enterprise agreement.
The Fair Work Commission's decision included specific orders regarding the changes to the enterprise agreement, detailing the new terms and conditions that would apply to the employees. These orders were designed to ensure that the changes were implemented in a manner that was fair and equitable, while also supporting the long-term viability of the enterprise. The decision underscored the importance of balancing the interests of both the employer and the employees in enterprise bargaining.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.