| [2021] FWCA 5605 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd
(AG2021/6782)
AKZO NOBEL PTY LTD SUNSHINE SITE ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 2021
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 8 SEPTEMBER 2021 |
Application for approval of the Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd Sunshine Site Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd Sunshine Site Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] I note that several clauses of the Agreement may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards. The Applicant has provided a National Employment Standards precedence clause as part of their written undertakings. I am consequently satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail.
[6] The United Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 15 September 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 June 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE513029 PR733658>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 5605
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 5605
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address included whether the agreement complied with the "better off overall test" as mandated by the Fair Work Act, ensuring that employees were not disadvantaged compared to their previous conditions. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the agreement contained provisions that were contrary to public policy or were otherwise unlawful. The court also considered whether the agreement had been made in good faith and whether it contained terms that were procedurally fair.
In delivering the decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement met the requirements of the better off overall test, as it provided employees with improved conditions and protections compared to their previous terms. The court determined that none of the provisions were contrary to public policy or unlawful, and it was satisfied that the agreement had been made in good faith. The commission approved the agreement, emphasising the importance of maintaining fair and balanced industrial relations in the workplace.
The final orders of the court were to approve the Akzo Nobel Pty Ltd Sunshine Site Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2021, subject to the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement. The approval was effective from the date of the decision, and the agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission. The decision provided clarity for both parties and established the terms and conditions for employees at the Sunshine Site going forward.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.