Akierman Holdings Pty Ltd v Akerman
Case
•
[2019] NSWSC 1486
•31 October 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Akierman Holdings Pty Ltd v Akerman [2019] NSWSC 1486
[2019] NSWSC 1486
31 October 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Akierman Holdings Pty Ltd sought relief against Akerman over a range of issues related to the governance and property transactions of the company. The dispute included the validity of an appointment of a managing director, the enforceability of an oral agreement for the sale of company property, and the rectification of the company’s share register. The Federal Court of Australia was tasked with resolving these matters.
The central legal questions before the court were whether the appointment of the managing director by the sole director was valid, the enforceability of an oral agreement for the sale of company property, and the appropriateness of rectifying the company’s share register. The court had to determine if the appointment followed proper procedures, if the oral agreement was binding, and whether the rectification of the share register would reflect the parties' true intentions.
The court found that the appointment of the managing director by the sole director was invalid because the company's articles of association did not provide for such an appointment. Additionally, the oral agreement for the sale of the company's property was not enforceable as the parties intended to formalise the agreement in writing at a later stage. However, the court did grant the rectification of the company’s share register to reflect the parties' intent, despite the belated recording of the transfer. The court refused to validate the agreement to sell the company’s share of the property under s 1322, as the party lacked the proper authority to enter into the agreement.
The court ordered the rectification of the company's share register to reflect the transfer of shares from the beneficiary's estate. The court did not enforce the oral agreement for the sale of company property and found the appointment of the managing director invalid. The court also refused to validate the agreement to sell the company's share of the property under s 1322.
The central legal questions before the court were whether the appointment of the managing director by the sole director was valid, the enforceability of an oral agreement for the sale of company property, and the appropriateness of rectifying the company’s share register. The court had to determine if the appointment followed proper procedures, if the oral agreement was binding, and whether the rectification of the share register would reflect the parties' true intentions.
The court found that the appointment of the managing director by the sole director was invalid because the company's articles of association did not provide for such an appointment. Additionally, the oral agreement for the sale of the company's property was not enforceable as the parties intended to formalise the agreement in writing at a later stage. However, the court did grant the rectification of the company’s share register to reflect the parties' intent, despite the belated recording of the transfer. The court refused to validate the agreement to sell the company’s share of the property under s 1322, as the party lacked the proper authority to enter into the agreement.
The court ordered the rectification of the company's share register to reflect the transfer of shares from the beneficiary's estate. The court did not enforce the oral agreement for the sale of company property and found the appointment of the managing director invalid. The court also refused to validate the agreement to sell the company's share of the property under s 1322.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
Legal Concepts
-
Contract Formation
-
Authority and Powers
-
Unanimous Assent
-
Rectification of Register
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Par Recycling Services Pty Ltd v Shoebill Pty Ltd; Somersby Aust Pty Ltd v Gallagher [2025] NSWSC 274
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Par Recycling Services Pty Ltd v Shoebill Pty Ltd; Somersby Aust Pty Ltd v Gallagher
[2025] NSWSC 274
Akierman Holdings Pty Limited v Akerman (No 3); In the matter of Akierman Holdings Pty Limited (No 2)
[2021] NSWSC 869
Akierman Holdings Pty Ltd v Akerman (No 2)
[2020] NSWSC 970
Cases Cited
13
Statutory Material Cited
4
R v Byrnes
[1995] HCA 1
R v Byrnes
[1995] HCA 1
DVT Holdings v Bigshop.com.au
[2002] NSWSC 571