Aged Care Quality And Safety Commission

Case [2024] FWCA 1294


[2024] FWCA 1294

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Aged Care Quality And Safety Commission

(AG2024/778)

AGED CARE QUALITY AND SAFETY COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024-2027

Aged care industry

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 11 APRIL 2024

Application for approval of the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the Commonwealth Of Australia As Represented By Aged Care Quality And Safety Commission (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 22 March 2024.

  1. On 26 March 2024, I conducted a telephone conference with the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including through the provision of an undertaking.

  1. The Agreement contains a number of changes which when considered in isolation, are less advantageous than the Award. These include increased ordinary hours, an expanded spread of hours and some penalty rates. I note that the Agreement also confers benefits of universal application including paid leave between Christmas and New Year and increased Superannuation Contributions.  I have not considered additional benefits which were conditional in their application and/or difficult to quantify in monetary terms.  I find that the universal improvements offset the disadvantages referred to. 

  1. The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 27 March 2024, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement. The undertaking deals with the following topics:

· The definition of a shift worker has been inserted and will also be for the purposes of the National Employment Standards (NES).

·  A Part-time minimum engagement has been inserted, consistent with the Australian Public Service Enterprise Award 2015.

·  The requirement to prescribe the agreed part time hours of working including the start and finish times so as to determine when overtime is payable has been inserted, consistent with the Australian Public Service Enterprise Award 2015.

·  For BOOT issues relating to Higher Duties, the Applicant has implemented a reconciliation process in line with Shop, Distributive and Allied Association v Beechworth Bakery Employee Co Pty Ltd T/A Beechworth Bakery.[1]

  1. A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representatives did not express any view on the undertaking.

  1. The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The Community and Public Sector Union and Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 28 February 2027.


COMMISSIONER


[1] [2017] FWCFB 1664.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE524172  PR773376>

Details
AGLC
Aged Care Quality And Safety Commission [2024] FWCA 1294
Case
[2024] FWCA 1294
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of an enterprise agreement. The agreement, proposed for the period 2024-2027, concerns the terms and conditions of employment for certain employees within the Commission. The Commission argued that the agreement was necessary to ensure the efficient and effective operation of the Commission and to provide fair and competitive remuneration and conditions for employees. The dispute centred on whether the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement contained all the mandatory terms prescribed by the Fair Work Act and whether it complied with the "better off overall test." This test requires that employees be no worse off financially and at least as well off in relation to non-financial terms compared to their existing conditions. The Commission needed to ensure that the agreement did not contravene any provisions of the Act and that it was fair and reasonable in all aspects.

In reaching its decision, the Commission examined the proposed agreement clause by clause, considering the fairness and competitiveness of the terms and conditions, the impact on employees, and compliance with statutory requirements. The Commission found that the agreement met all the necessary criteria, including the better off overall test, and that it provided for fair and competitive remuneration and conditions. The Commission also noted the agreement's provisions for flexibility and adaptability in response to changing operational needs. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, finding it to be fair and reasonable in all respects.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission Enterprise Agreement 2024-2027, effective from the date of the decision. The approval ensures that the agreement provides fair and competitive terms and conditions for employees while supporting the efficient and effective operation of the Commission. The Commission's decision confirms that the agreement complies with all statutory requirements and meets the better off overall test.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.