[2013] FWCA 4799 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
AGC Industries Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1547)
AGC INDUSTRIES PTY LTD ALCOA ELECTRICAL AND INSTRUMENTATION (CEPU) AGREEMENT 2013
Electrical contracting industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 19 JULY 2013 |
Application for approval of the AGC Industries Pty Ltd Alcoa Electrical and Instrumentation (CEPU) Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the AGC Industries Pty Ltd Alcoa Electrical and Instrumentation (CEPU) Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is three years from the date of operation.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE402453 PR539059>
- AGLC
- AGC Industries Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 4799
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4799
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval as a certified enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act. The court had to determine whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, whether it provided for appropriate mechanisms for resolution of disputes, and whether it complied with the procedural requirements for certification. Additionally, the court considered whether there were any grounds for objection to the agreement that would render it invalid.
The court examined the evidence and submissions from both the Fair Work Commission and the parties involved. It found that the agreement contained terms that were fair and reasonable for the employees, and that the process by which the agreement was negotiated and agreed upon was compliant with the relevant provisions of the Act. The court noted that there were no objections to the agreement that would prevent its certification. Consequently, the court approved the agreement, confirming that it met the necessary statutory criteria for being a certified enterprise agreement. The approval of the agreement allows it to have the force of a registered instrument, binding both the employer and the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.