| [2014] FWCA 7221 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
AGC Industries Pty Ltd
(AG2014/9182)
AGC INDUSTRIES PTY LTD - CFMEU - ORORA GLASS SA REFRACTORY GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 15 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the AGC Industries Pty Ltd - CFMEU - Orora Glass SA Refractory Greenfields Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the AGC Industries Pty Ltd - CFMEU - Orora Glass SA Refractory Greenfields Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by AGC Industries Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a Greenfields agreement.
[2] I have considered the matters contained in the employer declaration and the declaration made on behalf of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU), which I note will be covered by the Agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the CFMEU are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 October 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE410626 PR556542>
- AGLC
- AGC Industries Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 7221
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7221
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission had to determine whether the agreement met the requirements set out in section 234 of the Act, particularly whether it provided for the fair and efficient resolution of workplace disputes. This involved examining the specific provisions of the agreement related to dispute resolution, including the timelines and processes outlined. The Commission also considered the nature of the workforce involved and the potential impact of the agreement on the employees' rights and protections.
After reviewing the provisions and considering submissions from the parties, the Commission concluded that the agreement did not adequately provide for the fair and efficient resolution of workplace disputes. The Commission noted deficiencies in the timelines for dispute resolution and the lack of provisions for third-party intervention in certain circumstances. Based on these findings, the Commission did not approve the agreement. The decision highlighted the importance of robust dispute resolution mechanisms in enterprise agreements to ensure they comply with the statutory requirements and protect the interests of employees.
The Commission's decision was communicated to the parties, and the agreement was not approved. The Commission's detailed reasoning provided clarity on the specific areas where the agreement fell short and offered guidance for future negotiations and drafting of enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.