AEF15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection Tribunal
Case
•
[2015] FCA 1150
•21 October 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
AEF15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection Tribunal [2015] FCA 1150
[2015] FCA 1150
21 October 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AEF15, an individual, filed an application in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia seeking to restrain his removal from Australia. The Minister for Immigration and Border Protection responded to the application. The applicant's application was dismissed in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The applicant then filed an interlocutory application in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia seeking to restrain his removal from Australia.
The legal issues before the court were whether the applicant's application should be granted and, if so, on what terms. The court found that the applicant should be referred to a lawyer for legal assistance and that the applicant's application should be restrained until a further hearing. The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated that he had a substantial question to be tried on the hearing of the applicant's substantive application. The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated that there were exceptional circumstances which justified the grant of leave to appeal.
The court restrained the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection from removing the applicant from Australia until a further hearing. The court adjourned the hearing to a later date and ordered that the applicant file and serve any amended application for extension of time and leave to appeal, and any amended draft notice to appeal, by a certain time. The court reserved the costs of the hearing.
The orders of the court were that the applicant be referred to a lawyer for legal assistance, that the applicant file and serve any amended application for extension of time and leave to appeal, and any amended draft notice to appeal, by a certain time, that the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection be restrained from removing the applicant from Australia until a further hearing, that the applicant's application be adjourned for further hearing at a certain time, and that the costs of the hearing be reserved.
The legal issues before the court were whether the applicant's application should be granted and, if so, on what terms. The court found that the applicant should be referred to a lawyer for legal assistance and that the applicant's application should be restrained until a further hearing. The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated that he had a substantial question to be tried on the hearing of the applicant's substantive application. The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated that there were exceptional circumstances which justified the grant of leave to appeal.
The court restrained the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection from removing the applicant from Australia until a further hearing. The court adjourned the hearing to a later date and ordered that the applicant file and serve any amended application for extension of time and leave to appeal, and any amended draft notice to appeal, by a certain time. The court reserved the costs of the hearing.
The orders of the court were that the applicant be referred to a lawyer for legal assistance, that the applicant file and serve any amended application for extension of time and leave to appeal, and any amended draft notice to appeal, by a certain time, that the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection be restrained from removing the applicant from Australia until a further hearing, that the applicant's application be adjourned for further hearing at a certain time, and that the costs of the hearing be reserved.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration & Refugee Law
Legal Concepts
-
Interlocutory Orders
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
D'Arcy v Australian National University [2024] FedCFamC2G 609
Cases Citing This Decision
4
D'Arcy v Australian National University
[2024] FedCFamC2G 609
ABAR15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2016] FCA 363
D'Arcy v Australian National University
[2024] FedCFamC2G 609
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
2
AEF15 v Minister for Immigration
[2015] FCCA 884
SZWBH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2015] FCAFC 88
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS
[2013] FCAFC 114