| [2018] FWCA 1205 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
AE Smith & Sons Pty Ltd
(AG2018/560)
A E SMITH & SONS TASMANIA CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016 - 2018
Tasmania | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 26 FEBRUARY 2018 |
Application for variation of the A E Smith & Sons Tasmania Construction Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the A E Smith & Sons Tasmania Construction Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made by AE Smith & Sons Pty Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The Applicant provided written undertakings to meet such requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as were relevant to the application for approval of an enterprise agreement and the Agreement was approved on 14 November 2016. Those undertakings form part of the Agreement as varied.
[5] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 was taken to be a term of the Agreement. The model term forms part of the Agreement as varied.
[6] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[7] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 26 February 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE422174 PR600717>
- AGLC
- AE Smith and Sons Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 1205
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 1205
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered whether the application met the criteria for an extension of the agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved assessing whether the proposed changes were in good faith and whether the application of the proposed changes would not be detrimental to the employees. The Commission also considered the views of the employees and the impact of the proposed changes on the bargaining process.
After considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission found that the application met the criteria for an extension of the agreement. The proposed changes were in good faith and would not be detrimental to the employees. The Commission also found that the application of the proposed changes would not undermine the integrity of the bargaining process. Accordingly, the Commission varied the agreement to extend its operation until 31 December 2021.
The final orders of the Commission included the extension of the agreement until 31 December 2021 and the incorporation of the proposed changes into the agreement. The respondents were given the right to apply for a review of the decision within 21 days of the decision being made.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.