| [2019] FWCA 6804 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Advanced Plumbing and Drains (Canberra) Pty Ltd
(AG2019/2513)
Advanced Plumbing & Drains (Canberra) Pty Ltd and Employees Enterprise Agreement 2019-2023
| Plumbing industry | |
| Commissioner McKinnon | MELBOURNE, 2 OCTOBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the Advanced Plumbing and Drains (Canberra) Pty Ltd and Employees Enterprise Agreement 2019-2023.
Application has been made for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Advanced Plumbing and Drains (Canberra) Pty Ltd and Employees Enterprise Agreement 2019-2023 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Advanced Plumbing and Drains (Canberra) Pty Ltd.
Written undertakings have been given in accordance with s.190 of the Act. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.
With the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 October 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 October 2023.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE505547 PR712950>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Advanced Plumbing and Drains (Canberra) Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 6804
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 6804
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues in the case revolved around whether the enterprise agreement met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act, specifically whether it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and whether it was free from any unfair content. The union argued that the agreement fell short in providing adequate protection for employees in areas such as pay equity, working hours, and penalty rates. The employer, on the other hand, maintained that the agreement was comprehensive and in compliance with the law.
The Commission examined the enterprise agreement in detail, considering the arguments from both the union and the employer. The Commission found that while the agreement did contain the necessary minimum terms, it did not sufficiently address certain aspects of employee conditions, particularly regarding pay equity. The Commission also noted that the agreement was largely free from unfair content. However, it concluded that the deficiencies in pay equity warranted rejecting the agreement as it did not meet the statutory requirements for approval. Consequently, the Commission refused to approve the agreement, highlighting the importance of addressing all necessary conditions comprehensively within such agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.