[2013] FWCA 2115 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Advance Formwork Pty Ltd
(AG2013/4919)
ADVANCE FORMWORK PTY LTD AND EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012-2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 8 APRIL 2013 |
Application for approval of the Advance Formwork Pty Ltd and Employees Enterprise Agreement 2012-2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Advance Formwork Pty Ltd and Employees Enterprise Agreement 2012-2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2014.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE400661 PR535477>
- AGLC
- Advance Formwork Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 2115
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 2115
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court needed to address were whether the provisions of the proposed enterprise agreement met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act. This involved examining whether the agreement provided for minimum entitlements, whether it contained any terms that were contrary to public policy, and whether it was made in good faith. Additionally, the court had to consider if the agreement adequately provided for the proper negotiation process and if it was supported by the necessary majority of employees.
The Fair Work Commission, after considering the submissions from both parties, found that the proposed enterprise agreement did not adequately meet the requirements for approval. The commission noted that certain provisions of the agreement, particularly those relating to overtime, were not sufficiently clear and specific, which could lead to confusion and potential disputes in the future. The commission also identified issues with the negotiation process, finding that it did not meet the standard of good faith negotiation as required by the Act. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed.
No specific orders were made by the commission, as the primary focus of the decision was to determine the agreement's eligibility for approval rather than to mandate specific changes or conditions. The dismissal of the application effectively meant that the proposed enterprise agreement would not be legally binding on the parties involved until such time as it could be revised to meet the necessary legal standards.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.