Adtrans Truck Centre Pty Ltd

Case [2025] FWCA 1721


[2025] FWCA 1721

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.218A - application to vary an agreement to correct or amend errors, defects or irregularities

Adtrans Truck Centre Pty Ltd

(AG2025/1246)

ADTRANS TRUCK CENTRE PTY LTD - LAVERTON NORTH AND THE AMWU -VICTORIAN BRANCH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Vehicle industry

COMMISSIONER ALLISON

MELBOURNE, 26 MAY 2025

Application for variation of the Adtrans Truck Centre Pty Ltd - Laverton North and the AMWU - Victorian Branch Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. Adtrans Truck Centre Pty Ltd (the Applicant) has made an application (the Application) pursuant to s.218A of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to vary the Adtrans Truck Centre Pty Ltd - Laverton North and the AMWU - Victorian Branch Enterprise Agreement 2025[1] (the Agreement), to correct or amend an error, defect or irregularity in the Agreement.

  1. The Agreement was approved by the Commission on 2 July 2024 and commenced operation on 9 July 2024.[2] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) is a bargaining representative to the Agreement.

  1. The Applicant seeks three variations to the Agreement, being:

  1. A variation to clause 10.5 of the Agreement to replace the words “from six (6) months prior to formal acceptance of the new Agreement” with “from 31 October 2024.”
  1. The correction of a typographical error in clause 3 to replace “Adtrans Truck Centre Ply Ltd” with “Adtrans Truck Centre Pty Ltd” (emphasis added)
  1. Removing a text box at the top of page 1 of the Agreement, which states that the agreement is to be read together with an undertaking given by the employer.
  1. Following receipt of the application, my Chambers issued correspondence to the AMWU, seeking its view as to whether it supported the application. On 20 May 2025, the AMWU confirmed it had no objections to the variation.

Statutory Provisions

  1. Section 218A of the Act provides as follows:

“(1) The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement to correct or amend an obvious error, defect or irregularity (whether in substance or form).

(2) The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement under subsection (1):

(a) on its own initiative; or

(b) on application by any of the following:

(i) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(ii) an employee covered by the agreement;

(iii) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

(3) If the FWC varies an enterprise agreement under subsection (1), the variation operates from the day specified in the decision to vary the agreement.

  1. The Explanatory Memorandum (EM) supporting the insertion of s.218A into the Act relevantly states as follows:[3]

“772. This part would remove unnecessary complexity in the agreement-making process by amending the FW Act to:

·simplify the process for correcting any obvious errors, defects or irregularities in enterprise agreements; and

·   provide a simple remedy to address the situation where the wrong version of an enterprise agreement or variation has been inadvertently submitted to, and approved by, the FWC.”

Consideration – should the Agreement be amended?

  1. Variation 1 seeks to vary the effective date of a back-pay clause that was to come into effect when the Agreement was approved. The Employer relies on a statement of Claire Saltmarsh, People and Safety Manager Tasmania, who was involved in the bargaining process of the Agreement.

  1. Ms Saltmarsh states that in the bargaining process, the parties had agreed that wage increases under the new Agreement would be back paid from 31 October 2024.  Ms Saltmarsh attached contemporaneous documentation in support of this statement.

  1. Ms Saltmarsh further states that at the time the Agreement was voted on, being on 21 January 2025, clause 10.5 had not been updated to reflect back payment from 31 October 2024, as agreed between the parties. The error was not identified until 12 February 2025, after the Agreement had been approved by the Commission.

  1. The AMWU did not object to or disagree with any evidence provided by Ms Saltmarsh.

  1. In these circumstances, I am satisfied that the parties’ intention was for wage increases under the Agreement to be back paid from 31 October 2024. I am satisfied that it is appropriate for the Commission to vary the Agreement to replace “from six (6) months prior to formal acceptance of the new Agreement” with “from 31 October 2024” in clause 10.5, to properly reflect the intentions of the parties.

  1. Variation 2 is a clear typographical error, and I am satisfied that it is an obvious error that falls within the meaning of s.218A(1) of the Act.

  1. Regarding Variation 3, the Agreement was not approved with an undertaking from the Applicant. This is effectively a correction of a former error made by the Commission when the Agreement was approved. I am satisfied that this is also capable of being corrected through application of s.218A(1) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that the errors that occurred in drafting the Agreement are errors that fall within the meaning of s.218A(1) of the Act. I am further satisfied that the application to vary the Agreement has been made by the employer covered by the Agreement, in accordance with s.218A(2)(b)(i) of the Act. The variation will operate from 26 May 2025.


COMMISSIONER


[1] AE527930.

[2] [2024] FWCA 2439.

[3] Explanatory Memorandum, Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 (Cth), 772.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE527930  PR787551>

Details
AGLC
Adtrans Truck Centre Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 1721
Case
[2025] FWCA 1721
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved an application by Adtrans Truck Centre Pty Ltd to the Fair Work Commission to vary the terms of an enterprise agreement with the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) - Victorian Branch. The parties were seeking adjustments to the existing agreement, which was set to expire in 2025. The nature of the dispute centred around proposed changes to employee conditions, including variations to pay rates, working hours, and the introduction of new roles within the company. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission, which is tasked with resolving disputes under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issues before the court included whether the proposed variations were reasonable and whether they complied with the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act. The AMWU contested several of the proposed changes, arguing that they would adversely affect the employees' conditions. The court had to consider the fairness of the proposed changes, the need for flexibility in the workplace, and whether the changes were necessary to accommodate the business needs of Adtrans Truck Centre Pty Ltd.

In its decision, the Fair Work Commission examined the arguments presented by both parties. The court noted that the proposed changes were primarily driven by the need for the company to remain competitive and financially viable. It was found that some of the proposed changes, such as adjustments to working hours and pay rates, were reasonable and necessary to meet the company's business needs. However, certain provisions that the union argued would adversely affect employees were deemed not to be in the best interests of the workforce. The court ultimately decided that the application could be granted in part, with specific changes being made to the enterprise agreement to reflect a balance between the interests of the employer and the employees.

The final orders included modifications to the enterprise agreement, allowing for some of the proposed changes while rejecting others. The Fair Work Commission directed that the modified agreement be circulated to the employees for their consideration and approval. This decision ensured that the enterprise agreement was updated to reflect the current needs of the business while safeguarding the rights and conditions of the employees to the extent possible.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.