| [2014] FWCA 6750 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Adelaide Unicare Pty Ltd T/A Minlaton Medical Centre
(AG2014/9068)
MINLATON MEDICAL CENTRE NURSING EMPLOYEES & ANMF SA BRANCH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 25 SEPTEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Minlaton Medical Centre Nursing Employees & ANMF SA Branch Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Minlaton Medical Centre Nursing Employees & ANMF SA Branch Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Adelaide Unicare Pty Ltd T/A Minlaton Medical Centre and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I have considered the matters contained in the employer declaration and the declaration made on behalf of the ANMF, which I note will be covered by the Agreement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The ANMF, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 October 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 October 2017.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE410333 PR555901>
- AGLC
- Adelaide Unicare Pty Ltd T/A Minlaton Medical Centre [2014] FWCA 6750
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 6750
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved scrutiny of specific clauses in the enterprise agreement, including those related to wages, hours of work, leave provisions, and other employment conditions. The Commission had to determine whether these provisions met the requirements set forth in the Fair Work Act 2009 and if they provided a safety net for the employees. Furthermore, the Commission needed to assess whether the agreement facilitated genuine bargaining and if it was fair and reasonable in all aspects.
The Fair Work Commission, after careful consideration of the submissions and the evidence provided, found that the majority of the clauses in the enterprise agreement were compliant with the Fair Work Act. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and it facilitated genuine bargaining between the parties. However, certain provisions regarding shift differentials and overtime were found to be inadequate. Consequently, the Commission varied these provisions to ensure they met the necessary standards. The outcome was that the enterprise agreement was approved with the modifications made to the specified clauses.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.