[2014] FWCA 3552 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Adelaide Fertility Centre Pty Ltd T/A Repromed
(AG2014/6040)
ADELAIDE FERTILITY CENTRE PTY LTD (TRADING AS REPROMED) DARWIN EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 28 MAY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Adelaide Fertility Centre Pty Ltd (trading as Repromed) Darwin Employees Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Adelaide Fertility Centre Pty Ltd (trading as Repromed) Darwin Employees Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Adelaide Fertility Centre Pty Ltd T/A Repromed. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] In so finding, I note that the employer’s declaration indicted that the information regarding the ballot of employees was not provided to the employees at least 7 clear days before the commencement of the ballot. On face value, it would appear that the relevant 7 day access period requirements of s.180(3) and (4) of the Act had not been met in this case. Subsequent information provided to the Commission has confirmed that the information required by s.180(3) was given to the employees well in advance of the commencement of the access period.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 4 June 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE408367 PR551122>
- AGLC
- Adelaide Fertility Centre Pty Ltd T/A Repromed [2014] FWCA 3552
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 3552
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the negotiation process, ensuring it was genuinely undertaken and not coerced. It also assessed whether the agreement covered the correct employees within the bargaining unit and if it included all the mandatory minimum terms and conditions. Furthermore, the court considered whether the agreement unfairly disadvantaged any employee. After a thorough review, the court found that the agreement was negotiated genuinely, covered the correct bargaining unit, and contained all necessary minimum terms. The court was satisfied that the agreement did not unfairly disadvantage any employees.
Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the Darwin Employees Enterprise Agreement 2013. The agreement was deemed to be a genuine enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act, and it was registered. The decision confirmed the validity of the agreement and its applicability to the employees in question. The applicant's application for approval was thus successful, and the agreement was registered as required by law.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.