Addo v Senior Constable Jacovos

Case

[2016] QDC 271

4 November 2016


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Addo v Senior Constable Jacovos [2016] QDC 271 [2016] QDC 271 4 November 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellant, Addo, appealed against his conviction and sentence in the Magistrates Court, which had found him guilty of obstructing police and seriously assaulting police. The appeal was heard in the District Court of Queensland, presided over by Judge Murphy. The appeal was based on the argument that the sentence was manifestly excessive, that the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively, and that the parole eligibility date was not properly applied.

The legal issues before the court were whether the sentence was manifestly excessive, whether the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively, and whether the parole eligibility date was correctly applied. The court had to consider the totality principle, which requires that the overall punishment should not be disproportionate to the crimes committed. The appellant argued that the sentence was manifestly excessive, and that the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively. The court also had to consider whether the parole eligibility date was correctly applied.

The court found that the sentence was manifestly excessive and that the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively. The court found that the totality principle was not properly applied, and that the appellant's sentence was disproportionate to the crimes committed. The court found that the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively, and that the parole eligibility date was not properly applied. The court allowed the appeal and set aside the sentence and orders made in the Magistrates Court. In lieu, the court ordered that the appellant be sentenced to 3 months’ imprisonment for the offence of obstruct police, 12 months’ imprisonment for the offence of serious assault police, that those periods of imprisonment be served concurrently with each other, but cumulatively upon the term of imprisonment imposed on 14 August 2013, and that a parole release date be fixed at 19 December 2016.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Sentencing

  • Limitation Periods

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

6

Cases Cited

14

Statutory Material Cited

3