Addo v Senior Constable Jacovos
Case
•
[2016] QDC 271
•4 November 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Addo v Senior Constable Jacovos [2016] QDC 271
[2016] QDC 271
4 November 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellant, Addo, appealed against his conviction and sentence in the Magistrates Court, which had found him guilty of obstructing police and seriously assaulting police. The appeal was heard in the District Court of Queensland, presided over by Judge Murphy. The appeal was based on the argument that the sentence was manifestly excessive, that the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively, and that the parole eligibility date was not properly applied.
The legal issues before the court were whether the sentence was manifestly excessive, whether the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively, and whether the parole eligibility date was correctly applied. The court had to consider the totality principle, which requires that the overall punishment should not be disproportionate to the crimes committed. The appellant argued that the sentence was manifestly excessive, and that the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively. The court also had to consider whether the parole eligibility date was correctly applied.
The court found that the sentence was manifestly excessive and that the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively. The court found that the totality principle was not properly applied, and that the appellant's sentence was disproportionate to the crimes committed. The court found that the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively, and that the parole eligibility date was not properly applied. The court allowed the appeal and set aside the sentence and orders made in the Magistrates Court. In lieu, the court ordered that the appellant be sentenced to 3 months’ imprisonment for the offence of obstruct police, 12 months’ imprisonment for the offence of serious assault police, that those periods of imprisonment be served concurrently with each other, but cumulatively upon the term of imprisonment imposed on 14 August 2013, and that a parole release date be fixed at 19 December 2016.
The legal issues before the court were whether the sentence was manifestly excessive, whether the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively, and whether the parole eligibility date was correctly applied. The court had to consider the totality principle, which requires that the overall punishment should not be disproportionate to the crimes committed. The appellant argued that the sentence was manifestly excessive, and that the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively. The court also had to consider whether the parole eligibility date was correctly applied.
The court found that the sentence was manifestly excessive and that the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively. The court found that the totality principle was not properly applied, and that the appellant's sentence was disproportionate to the crimes committed. The court found that the sentences should have been ordered to be served concurrently rather than cumulatively, and that the parole eligibility date was not properly applied. The court allowed the appeal and set aside the sentence and orders made in the Magistrates Court. In lieu, the court ordered that the appellant be sentenced to 3 months’ imprisonment for the offence of obstruct police, 12 months’ imprisonment for the offence of serious assault police, that those periods of imprisonment be served concurrently with each other, but cumulatively upon the term of imprisonment imposed on 14 August 2013, and that a parole release date be fixed at 19 December 2016.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Sentencing
-
Limitation Periods
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Robinson v Commissioner of Police [2023] QDC 93
Cases Citing This Decision
6
Robinson v Commissioner of Police
[2023] QDC 93
DYN v Queensland Police Service
[2020] QDC 47
Cases Cited
14
Statutory Material Cited
3
White v Commissioner of Police
[2014] QCA 121
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li
[2013] HCA 18
Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc
[1981] HCA 39