Adbri Masonry Group Pty Ltd v Ecopave Australia Holdings Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2011] ATMO 42
•27 May 2011
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Adbri Masonry Group Pty Ltd v Ecopave Australia Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] ATMO 42
[2011] ATMO 42
27 May 2011
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Adbri Masonry Group Pty Ltd, the applicant, sought to register a trade mark, while Ecopave Australia Holdings Pty Ltd was the opponent. The dispute concerned the registrability of the trade mark, with the opponent having opposed the application. The decision was made by Iain Thompson.
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was whether to register the trade mark, having regard to the grounds on which the application was opposed. This required the Registrar to determine the extent to which any of those grounds of opposition had been established.
The Registrar, applying section 55 of the relevant legislation, refused to register the trade mark. The Registrar found that the opponent had been successful in its opposition. Consequently, the opponent was awarded costs on the official scale against the applicant.
The primary legal issue before the Registrar was whether to register the trade mark, having regard to the grounds on which the application was opposed. This required the Registrar to determine the extent to which any of those grounds of opposition had been established.
The Registrar, applying section 55 of the relevant legislation, refused to register the trade mark. The Registrar found that the opponent had been successful in its opposition. Consequently, the opponent was awarded costs on the official scale against the applicant.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Commercial Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
JAS-Oceania Pty Ltd v Joint Analytical Systems GmbH [2011] ATMO 105
Cases Citing This Decision
3
Southcorp Brands Pty Ltd v Can Industries Pty Lt
[2014] ATMO 27
JAS-Oceania Pty Ltd v Joint Analytical Systems GmbH
[2011] ATMO 105
Ferring BV v Pure Health Direct Pty Ltd
[2011] ATMO 99
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
0
Pfizer Products Inc v Karam
[2006] FCA 1663
Babaniaris v Lutony Fashions Pty Ltd
[1987] HCA 19
John v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
[1989] HCA 5