| [2021] FWCA 7114 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Activaterail Pty Ltd
(AG2021/8191)
ACTIVATERAIL AND RTBU SAFEWORKING AGREEMENT 2021
Rail industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT EASTON | SYDNEY, 14 DECEMBER 2021 |
Application for approval of the ActivateRail and RTBU Safeworking Agreement 2021.
[1] Activaterail Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application for the approval of the ActivateRail and RTBU Safeworking Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made under s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings, a copy of which are attached as Annexure A to this decision. The undertakings can be accepted under s.190 of the Act because I am satisfied that they will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement pursuant to s.191 of the Act.
[3] Subject to the Employer’s undertakings, I am satisfied that each relevant requirement in sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act has been met.
[4] I note that the following clauses are potentially inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
● Clause 2.9(b) and (c) – Casual Conversion
● Clause 2.10.3 – Termination of Employment
● Clause 8.2.1 – Redundancy – Employees Exempted
● Clause 16.1.4 and 16.1.7 – Public Holidays
[5] Noting the undertaking provided by the Employer, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[6] The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (RTBU) was a bargaining representative for the Agreement and has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the RTBU.
[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 December 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE514279 PR736768>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Activaterail Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 7114
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 7114
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved determining whether the agreement met the necessary standards set forth in the Fair Work Act. These included ensuring that the agreement contained provisions that were fair and reasonable, and that it did not adversely affect the safety of employees or the public. Additionally, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement was likely to be accepted by the relevant workforce and whether it would promote productivity and industrial harmony. The applicant had to demonstrate that the agreement was necessary to address the operational requirements of the rail industry, particularly in relation to safeworking practices.
The Commission's reasoning focused on the specific provisions of the agreement and their alignment with the statutory requirements. It was noted that the agreement contained clauses that were designed to enhance safety and operational efficiency. The Commission was satisfied that the proposed agreement was fair and reasonable, and that it did not negatively impact the safety of employees or the public. The Commission also considered the views of the RTBU and Activaterail, along with broader industry stakeholders, in reaching its decision. The evidence presented indicated that the agreement was likely to be accepted by the workforce and would contribute positively to industrial harmony. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement, recognising its importance for the rail industry.
The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the ActivateRail and RTBU Safeworking Agreement 2021, with the agreement to be registered under the Fair Work Act. This decision provided certainty and clarity for both the RTBU and Activaterail, allowing them to implement the agreed terms in their operations. The Commission's approval was contingent on the agreement being implemented in good faith and in accordance with the terms set out in the approved document.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.