[2013] FWCA 4556 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
ACI Operations Pty Ltd T/A O-I Sydney
(AG2013/1392)
O-I SYDNEY GLASSWORKER WORKPLACE AGREEMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER RYAN | MELBOURNE, 9 JULY 2013 |
Application for approval of the O-I Sydney Glassworker Workplace Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the O-I Sydney Glassworker Workplace Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by ACI Operations Pty Ltd T/A O-I Sydney. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] An undertaking has been given in relation to the Agreement and this undertaking has become a term of the Agreement in accordance with s.191(2) of the Act and is appended at Appendix A.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 16 July 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 February 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE402295 PR538764>
APPENDIX A
- AGLC
- ACI Operations Pty Ltd T/A O-I Sydney [2013] FWCA 4556
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4556
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The union argued that specific provisions within the agreement, such as those concerning employee entitlements, procedural fairness, and dispute resolution mechanisms, did not comply with the legislative standards designed to protect workers' interests. The union further contended that the agreement failed to provide adequate safeguards for employees in terms of their rights to fair treatment and protection against unjust dismissal.
The Commission examined the agreement in detail, considering the arguments presented by both parties. It assessed whether the agreement provided for a fair and equitable workplace, aligned with the principles of the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that while the agreement contained several commendable provisions, certain clauses did not sufficiently protect employee rights as required by law. Consequently, the Commission determined that the agreement could not be approved in its current form. However, the Commission also found that with specific amendments, the agreement could meet the necessary standards. The Commission outlined the required changes and directed that the parties negotiate and finalise these amendments within a specified timeframe.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.