ACI Operations Pty Ltd T/A O-I Sydney

Case [2013] FWCA 4556


[2013] FWCA 4556

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

ACI Operations Pty Ltd T/A O-I Sydney
(AG2013/1392)

O-I SYDNEY GLASSWORKER WORKPLACE AGREEMENT 2013

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER RYAN

MELBOURNE, 9 JULY 2013

Application for approval of the O-I Sydney Glassworker Workplace Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the O-I Sydney Glassworker Workplace Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and was made by ACI Operations Pty Ltd T/A O-I Sydney. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] An undertaking has been given in relation to the Agreement and this undertaking has become a term of the Agreement in accordance with s.191(2) of the Act and is appended at Appendix A.

[4] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1), will operate from 16 July 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 February 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code J, AE402295  PR538764>
APPENDIX A

Details
AGLC
ACI Operations Pty Ltd T/A O-I Sydney [2013] FWCA 4556
Case
[2013] FWCA 4556
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved a dispute between ACI Operations Pty Ltd, trading as O-I Sydney, and the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, where the primary issue was the approval of the O-I Sydney Glassworker Workplace Agreement 2013. The union contested certain aspects of the agreement, arguing they did not adequately protect employee rights and conditions.

The central legal issues revolved around whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The union argued that specific provisions within the agreement, such as those concerning employee entitlements, procedural fairness, and dispute resolution mechanisms, did not comply with the legislative standards designed to protect workers' interests. The union further contended that the agreement failed to provide adequate safeguards for employees in terms of their rights to fair treatment and protection against unjust dismissal.

The Commission examined the agreement in detail, considering the arguments presented by both parties. It assessed whether the agreement provided for a fair and equitable workplace, aligned with the principles of the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that while the agreement contained several commendable provisions, certain clauses did not sufficiently protect employee rights as required by law. Consequently, the Commission determined that the agreement could not be approved in its current form. However, the Commission also found that with specific amendments, the agreement could meet the necessary standards. The Commission outlined the required changes and directed that the parties negotiate and finalise these amendments within a specified timeframe.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.