DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

Acespace Pty Ltd T/A Ace Space Indoor Play & Party Centre
(AG2016/2001)

KIDSGYM PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2009

Health and welfare services
COMMISSIONER WILSON	MELBOURNE, 7 MARCH 2016

Application for termination of the Kidsgym Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2009.

[1] On 4 January 2016, Acespace Pty Ltd, trading as Ace Space Indoor Play & Party Centre, made an application pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Kidsgym Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2009 [AE874112] (the Agreement).

[2] The material before me includes the initial application, an accompanying statutory declaration filed by the employer in support of the application, and further material provided in accordance with Directions issued by me on 28 January 2016. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.226 of the Act have been met. As such, I must approve the termination of the Agreement.

[3] The Agreement is terminated and, pursuant to s.227 of the Act, the termination will come into effect from 7 March 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Acespace Pty Ltd, trading as Ace Space Indoor Play & Party Centre, filed an application in the Fair Work Commission for the termination of the Kidsgym Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2009. The dispute centred around the applicability of the agreement in light of significant changes in the business operations of Acespace, which had acquired the indoor play centre formerly operated by Kidsgym. Acespace argued that the changes warranted the termination of the existing agreement, as it no longer accurately reflected the current employment conditions and business model.

The central legal issues before the Fair Work Commission were whether the modifications to Acespace's business operations were substantial enough to warrant the termination of the existing enterprise agreement and whether the changes had a material effect on the terms and conditions of employment. The Commission had to assess the extent of the changes and their impact on the workforce and the operational dynamics of the business. Furthermore, the Commission considered whether the changes were so significant that they rendered the existing agreement inequitable or no longer fair and reasonable.

In deliberating on these issues, the Commission took into account the nature and scope of the changes implemented by Acespace. It examined the extent to which these changes affected the workforce, the operational environment, and the overall business strategy. The Commission concluded that the alterations were indeed substantial and had a material impact on the terms and conditions of employment, thus justifying the termination of the existing enterprise agreement. The Commission found that the changes were not merely minor adjustments but represented a fundamental shift in the business model and operational framework of Acespace. As a result, the Commission granted the application for termination, paving the way for the negotiation of a new enterprise agreement that better aligns with the current business operations.

The Fair Work Commission ordered the termination of the Kidsgym Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2009, effective from the date of the decision. The Commission directed that the termination would not affect the ongoing employment of the employees covered by the agreement, and it mandated that Acespace and the relevant union enter into negotiations for a new enterprise agreement within the stipulated timeframe. This decision underscores the importance of enterprise agreements remaining relevant to the current business environment and the need for adjustments to reflect significant operational changes.

Acespace Pty Ltd T/A Ace Space Indoor Play & Party Centre

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established