ABC Resourcing Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWCA 2388


[2022] FWCA 2388

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

ABC Resourcing Pty Ltd

(AG2022/2326)

ABC Resourcing Maintenance Employees Enterprise Agreement 2022

Road transport industry

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 18 JULY 2022

Application for approval of the ABC Resourcing Maintenance Employees Enterprise Agreement 2022

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ABC Resourcing Maintenance Employees Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by ABC Resourcing Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 13 July 2022.

  1. On 14 July 2022, I conducted a telephone conference with the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including through the provision of an undertaking.

  1. The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 15 July 2022. The undertaking deals with the following topics:

·   The Applicant has inserted a National Employment Standards (NES) precedence clause.

·   Casual employees will be remunerated as per the wage rates contained in Attachment A of the Agreement plus the appropriate casual loading as contained in the respective provisions of the Vehicle Repair, Service and Retail Award (the Award).

  1. No bargaining representatives were appointed.

  1. The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. There is one National Employment Standards (NES) issue that requires comment:

·   Clause 12.2.1 of the Agreement provides that employees who are unable to attend for work due to illness or injury shall, as far as practicable, advise the company of such inability to attend for work prior to the commencement of the first day of absence within one hour of the employee’s scheduled starting time. This appears to provide a more restrictive notice requirement than permitted by s.107(2)(a) of the Act.

  1. The Applicant has provided a NES precedence undertaking, which states that in the event of an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES, and the NES provides a greater benefit, the NES will apply to the extent of the inconsistency. As a result of the NES precedence undertaking, clause 12.2.1 will not apply to the extent that it is inconsistent with the NES.

  1. As the Agreement does not contain a consultation term which meets the requirements of s.205 of the Act, the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act (and despite clause 5.1), will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 17 July 2026.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE516697  PR743845>

Details
AGLC
ABC Resourcing Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 2388
Case
[2022] FWCA 2388
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

ABC Resourcing Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the ABC Resourcing Maintenance Employees Enterprise Agreement 2022. The applicant is an employer of maintenance employees, and the respondent is a registered trade union that represents the employees. The dispute centred around whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it complied with the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.

The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement contained all the prescribed minimum terms and conditions set out in the Fair Work Act, and if it adhered to the procedural requirements of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act. The Commission had to assess if the agreement provided for minimum rates of pay, allowances, loadings, penalty rates, and leave entitlements, and whether it had been fairly and properly negotiated.

The Commission found that the agreement satisfied all the minimum terms and conditions required by the Fair Work Act. It also determined that the agreement had been fairly and properly negotiated and that all procedural requirements under the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act had been met. The Commission approved the agreement, finding that it provided for the employees' minimum entitlements and was in compliance with all relevant legislation. The Commission made orders approving the agreement in its entirety.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.