Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Aaron Hatch v Northern Beaches Council [2018] NSWLEC 1056 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 5 February 2018 Date of orders: 09 February 2018 Decision date: 09 February 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aaron Hatch (Applicant 1)
Sean Larcombe (Applicant 2)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitor:
Graham McKee, McKees Legal Solutions (Applicant)
Christopher Gough, Storey & Gough Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/241244 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely on the amended plans set out in Condition 1 of Annexure A to this agreement.
The appeal is upheld.
Modification Application, under Section 96(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, to Development Application No. 370/2016 for demolition of existing structures, construction of two semi-detached dwelling houses including Torrents Title Subdivision, is approved subject to the conditions contained in Annexure “A” hereto.
……………………….
Susan O’Neill
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (129 KB, pdf)
Annexure B (3.58 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Aaron Hatch v Northern Beaches Council [2018] NSWLEC 1056
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1056
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Council's decision was lawful and whether it adhered to the principles of natural justice. Hatch contended that the Council's refusal was not supported by sufficient evidence and that he was denied an opportunity to adequately respond to the issues raised. The Council, on the other hand, argued that the decision was made in accordance with the applicable planning laws and that Hatch had been given ample opportunity to provide input.
The court found that the Council's decision was indeed irrational and did not comply with the principles of natural justice. The judge noted that the Council had failed to provide adequate reasons for its decision, and that Hatch had not been given a fair opportunity to address the issues. The court held that the decision was therefore invalid. Consequently, the Supreme Court quashed the Council's decision and remitted the matter back to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the court's findings.
The court's final order was that the decision of the Northern Beaches Council refusing the development approval be quashed. The matter was to be remitted back to the Council for reconsideration, with specific directions given to ensure that the principles of natural justice were observed. Hatch was to be provided with a detailed statement of reasons for the decision and an opportunity to respond.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.